Search for: "Cash v. Cash" Results 4441 - 4460 of 8,535
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
Last week, in Federal Trade Commission v Actavis Inc. et Al., the US Supreme Court turned its attention to a fascinating crossroad of IP and competition law, reverse payment settlements. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:33 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Chasing Hawk and an employee of Lakota Cash, LLC (“Lakota Cash”), a subsidiary of Western Sky, which purportedly shows that Lakota Cash prepared the letter for Mr. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:55 am by Sai Vinod
 Topics: The antitrust and IP principles protect and encourage competition, innovation, and economic growthPatent-Eligible Matter after Mayo v/s Prometheus Case in the U.S.ITC-Tea Board “Darjeeling” Litigation: Geographical Indications v/s TrademarksAccess to Information is a driver of InnovationFair Use under Copyright Law and recent developmentsPrizes:First: Full tuition waiver for the Intellectual Property Summer Institute at Concord, New Hampshire and a… [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 4:01 pm
  Maybe there are cases in which the jury was paid cash -- or plied with alcohol -- in return for returning a death sentence. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 6:42 am by Joy Waltemath
In light of evidence that a former nanny’s employers were aware of and disregarded federal and state minimum wage laws, sometimes paid her in cash, failed to record her hours, and made comments about her status as an alien, the Eleventh Circuit reversed a lower court erred that entered judgment as a matter of law against her (Davila v Menendez, June 10, 2013, Pryor, W). [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:31 pm by JB
It was also addressed by the doctrine of Swift v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 7:06 am by Barry Sookman
CJEU reasoning in Usedsoft v Oracle http://bit.ly/13zsrq5 Monsanto Wins Again in Federal Circuit: Organic Farmers Have No Standing to Challenge Patent http://bit.ly/13zsfqL A majority of Americans find government&rsqu [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 4:31 am by Giles Peaker
Payment had been held to cover situations other than cash, cheque or bank transfer in White v Elmdene Estates Ltd [1960] 1 QB 1, [1960] AC 528, where an obligation to give a £500 discount on a sale associated with a tenancy letting had been found to be payment of a premium. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 4:31 am by Giles Peaker
Payment had been held to cover situations other than cash, cheque or bank transfer in White v Elmdene Estates Ltd [1960] 1 QB 1, [1960] AC 528, where an obligation to give a £500 discount on a sale associated with a tenancy letting had been found to be payment of a premium. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 4:49 am by Susan Brenner
Cash vault delivery is a service that allows authorized customers to select locations for cash deliveries. [read post]