Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 4441 - 4460 of 12,893
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2012, 4:29 am by David Lynn
In responses to Bank of America Corporation, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Textron, the Staff indicated that there appeared to be some basis that the companies could exclude the proxy access proposals under Rule 14a-8(c), which provides that a proponent may submit no more than one proposal. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 4:22 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The actual authority is authority the principle intentionally confers; c. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 8:26 am by Paul E. Freehling
  The court wrote: “[B]ased on the evidence, Nightingale’s conduct is more properly defined as a separation from the company which was unconditional and intended to operate as a permanent termination of the employment relationship between Nightingale and Helmuth. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 9:00 pm
If you plan to buy shares in an EU based company, you better hire an EU law expert first. [read post]
Therefore, we may inevitably see women being appointed leaders during times of crisis, especially because there are more women in mid-management roles, poised to move into senior leadership or the C-suite. [read post]
Therefore, we may inevitably see women being appointed leaders during times of crisis, especially because there are more women in mid-management roles, poised to move into senior leadership or the C-suite. [read post]
13 May 2014, 6:45 am by INFORRM
The ECJ took a similar approach with regard to the rights set out in Articles 12(b) and 14(a) DPD, which concerned the right to be forgotten. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 2:08 pm
Company’s Freedom of Speech? [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 4:07 pm
This is a reasonably common practice for professionals service firms to produce thought-provoking interviews or written pieces to establish themselves as thought leaders, with a view to influence key decision makers and gain strategic or tactical projects.However, it appears that Ernst and Young did not adequately disclose this relationship to companies A, B and C. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 4:09 am by admin
C-34, contains a standalone civil provision that prohibits such claims where they are not based on adequate and proper tests (section 74.01(1)(b)). [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 12:01 pm
Therefore, the Cancellation Division rightly concluded that the sign lacked any distinctive character under Art. 7(1)(b)....But not if it's acquired distinctiveness through use...War time Kit Kat Article 52(2) provides that where the mark has been registered in breach of the grounds laid down in Art. 7(1)(b), (c) or (d) it may nevertheless not be declared invalid if it has acquired distinctive character through use in the relevant part of the EU where it was previously… [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 8:34 am by Joy Waltemath
Interstate Management Co., LLC dba Hamilton Crowne Plaza Hotel, March 3, 2017, Kavanaugh, B.). [read post]