Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 7,401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2017, 2:39 pm
With hendiadys, a phrase with an “x and y” structure does not refer to two separate things. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 11:13 am
Thus, the Commission can choose to apply Title I and not Title II—but if it does, its choice will be meaningless. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 2:23 pm
But what does increasing competition even mean? [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 9:32 am
Formation The court has little regard for the email notice, in part because it apparently didn’t have a call-to-action (if X, then Y). [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 4:02 am
A times B times C equals X. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:09 pm
The Claimant never suggested otherwise and I considered it to have been a deliberate act. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 2:57 pm
The death knell for many of the pieces we looked over the summer was the question, “is this the best piece we’re going to get on X? [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 9:51 am
” I remember that like I remember where I was on 9/11. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 10:35 am
How does that work? [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 10:52 am
It would make us uncomfortable to say, “X is the right thing to do, but I’m not going to do it because it is too expensive. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 6:35 am
And 9 x 2 is 18. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:27 am
It would make us uncomfortable to say, “X is the right thing to do, but I’m not going to do it because it is too expensive. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
So, where does that leave most practising lawyers? [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 11:14 am
Why do I need to provide additional info if I check my tax account online? [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 11:00 pm
Nobody ever does. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 11:00 pm
Nobody ever does. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 11:00 pm
Nobody ever does. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 8:00 pm
Well, first to the billing partner, so that it does get written off before it ever goes on the actual bill, and then how can I show the real value to the client. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 1:50 pm
How does that work? [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 5:30 am
Thaddeus–X v. [read post]
