Search for: "Does, A-H"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 16,610
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2014, 7:49 am
The research by Mueller and Oppenheimer serves as a reminder, however, that even when technology allows us to do more in less time, it does not always foster learning. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 5:53 am
With this in mind, I think it's useful to clarify the record of the Roberts Court to date, so that we may accurately identify how the New Roberts Court's behavior departs from recent trends, if it does. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 6:50 am
Academic discussions of whether Congress does (or should) have standing to sue the executive branch may, in the end, be quite moot. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 10:07 am
Most environmental regulations are predicated on the idea that market failures exist when the government does not intervene. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 2:33 pm
As I discuss in this post for PERC, the order does not itself rescind the WOTUS rule — and it couldn’t even if Trump had wanted it to. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 8:23 pm
According to the White House, the relevant Dodd-Frank language does not preclude the use of the VRA to fill this vacancy. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 2:50 pm
What Jilani describes at Think Progress, if true, does not reflect well on his former employer. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 11:26 am
This does not mean, though, that the mountaintop is entirely beyond reach.... [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:41 am
Bartenstein does not name names. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 9:27 am
I like how it does not put the nine tactics for succeeding in China business in any sort of order. [read post]
31 May 2023, 5:16 am
Source: Lin, H. (2016). [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 4:02 pm
At some point, the SCLF also became aware that Mr H was advertising the property for short term sublets (it is not clear of part or whole, but given the prohibition this does not matter) on a ‘holiday let’ website. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 5:42 pm
And how does the government explain why the identical language in subsection 203(h)(1) applies to all derivative beneficiaries while the same words in subsection 203(h)(3) apply only to a narrow subset of derivative beneficiaries? [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
They adopted the plainly self-defeating position of pleading with the chief executive to be more generous with the treasury’s money, while simultaneously arguing that the executive had no authority to dip into the public coffers in the first place.Were they perhaps entitled nonetheless to have DOE promulgate the program through a procedure that would’ve enabled them at least to make a pitch for more inclusive criteria of debt relief even if, in the end, their own argument… [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:01 pm
[The tenth entry in our FTC UMC Rulemaking symposium comes from guest contributor Kacyn H. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:00 am
Does my employer need to contact them? [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 6:57 am
However, it is important to note that the new reciprocity schedule does not apply to H-1B or L-1B visas. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:51 am
Accordingly, so far they have not been used, and this failure may be attributed to some of its own defining features (e.g. the acceptance of its jurisdiction is not compulsory and it does not publicly communicate the outcome of its investigations). [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 4:38 am
Colorado Criminal Defense Lawyer - H. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 11:42 pm
But addressing them does not require us to define our own moral duties in racial and ethnic terms. [read post]
