Search for: "Does 1 through 5" Results 4441 - 4460 of 24,644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2014, 12:00 am by My name
  The Court stated that while the FCC does have the ability to generally regulate telecommunications, by classifying ISPs as exempt from common carrier status, they were relying on statutes for their authority in creating the Net Neutrality rules that did not apply to those outside of common carrier status. [5] What is common carrier status, exactly? [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
  Group LTD insurance through one’s employment typically pays benefits for those who have remained out of work for what has been a period of 3 to 5 months, depending on one’s insurance policy. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Department of Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service published proposed regulations regarding the 1% excise tax on certain stock redemptions and economically similar transactions (corporate “repurchases”) by publicly traded U.S. corporations (“Covered Corporations”) on or after January 1, 2023, described in Section 4501 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Excise Tax”). [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 2:52 pm by Mandelman
  The only person I know who has is my dentist… he does quite a bit of “extracting,” and it’s not a pleasant task, but apparently… if I’m reading this right, and I am… these guys get bonuses for their “extracting,” so they must grow to enjoy “extracting. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 7:23 am by Thomas Schober
Any product that does not have and ECCN is designated as EAR99, which usually does not need an export license, unless it is exported to an embargoed country or in support of a prohibited end-use. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 12:09 pm by Ken Herzinger
” [1] (1) Principle #1: The SEC’s mission is our touchstone; (2) Principle #2: Our analysis starts and ends with the long-term interests of the Main Street investor; (3) Principle #3: The SEC’s historic approach to regulation is sound; (4) Principle #4: Regulatory actions drive change, and change can have lasting effects; (5) Principle #5: As markets evolve, so must the SEC: (6) Principle #6: Effective rulemaking does not end… [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 7:23 am by Thomas Schober
Any product that does not have and ECCN is designated as EAR99, which usually does not need an export license, unless it is exported to an embargoed country or in support of a prohibited end-use. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 12:09 pm by Ken Herzinger
” [1] (1) Principle #1: The SEC’s mission is our touchstone; (2) Principle #2: Our analysis starts and ends with the long-term interests of the Main Street investor; (3) Principle #3: The SEC’s historic approach to regulation is sound; (4) Principle #4: Regulatory actions drive change, and change can have lasting effects; (5) Principle #5: As markets evolve, so must the SEC: (6) Principle #6: Effective rulemaking does not end… [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This line of cases does more than create a conflict with Rogers and its progeny. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 2:45 pm by William Kane
See, https://www.cmegroup.com/trading/bitcoin-futures.html [11] Ibid at *3. [12] Ibid at * 4. [13] Ibid at *5. [14] Ibid at *5. [15] Ibid at *4. [16] Ibid at * 5. [17] The California legislature on September 28, 2018 passed two new bills recognizing block chain technology and encouraging its adoption and development. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm by William Kane and Pavel Sternberg
See, https://www.cmegroup.com/trading/bitcoin-futures.html [11] Ibid at *3. [12] Ibid at * 4. [13] Ibid at *5. [14] Ibid at *5. [15] Ibid at *4. [16] Ibid at * 5. [17] The California legislature on September 28, 2018 passed two new bills recognizing block chain technology and encouraging its adoption and development. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 10:46 am by Antonin I. Pribetic
That order obviously does not finally decide the substantive issue affecting the appellant and the respondent Cavell, because it does not approve the scheme of arrangement. [read post]