Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2013, 3:18 pm
A discussion panel will examine the importance of dissenting judgments in English Law. [read post]
18 May 2013, 7:36 am
State of Connecticut Dept. of Educ. [read post]
18 May 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/ON5e4Dgt2y -> New anti-spam laws aimed at safer online world http://t.co/4KVM3vv5BL -> Organisations using privacy policies 'to protect themselves', says ICO http://t.co/ZEydJ1rB4U -> ASCAP President Paul Williams’ “State Of The Union” To Songwriters! [read post]
17 May 2013, 9:30 pm
(Hat tip: H-Law) Marc Lender discusses his book on Gitlow v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 12:59 am
The latest Nokia v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 6:05 pm
The case is Dos Santos v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 7:54 am
Plain English Summary: Under the U.S. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:47 am
By way of contrast with the treatment of this issue in the United States, Norman takes a look at a very recent decision of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 451 (Kitchin, Richards and Lewison LLJ var’g [2012] EWHC 1789 (Pat) Floyd J). [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:05 am
The only European authority on "staple commercial products" cited was a Patents County Court decision in Pavel v Sony Corporation where HHJ Ford stated that a "staple commercial product is a commodity or raw material". [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
One approach, and the correct approach in my view, was succinctly stated by the Supreme Court of Canada in Shell Oil [1982] 2 SCR 536 summarizing a long line of English authority: A disembodied idea is not per se patentable. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:45 am
This bring us to the second case, Tremblay v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 3:00 am
Maclean v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 3:22 pm
United States and Victoria's Secret Direct v. [read post]
Ten ways in which copyright engages freedom of expression, Part 2: Sliders six to ten – Graham Smith
3 May 2013, 5:05 pm
Sir Tim Berners Lee said in the early days of the Web: “The first amendment to the Constitution of the United States … addresses the right to speak. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:46 am
In Broca v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:56 pm
He wrote in English, a language he mastered in prison. [read post]
1 May 2013, 6:13 pm
Rumpole practice tip #19: Be aware of Wilson v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 3:00 am
Maclean v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
” In a case that came before the highest court in New York State in 1984, People v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:46 am
It’s been called “as deplorable and despicable as it is patently offensive,” and “probably the most offensive word in English. [read post]
