Search for: "Edwards v State"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 4,760
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2008, 3:27 pm
Related Web Resources: Shammami v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 2:57 pm
Edwards [LII case backgrounder; merit briefs], 07-208, a case in which the Court is considering whether states may adopt a higher standard for measuring competency to represent oneself at trial than for measuring competency to stand trial. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:31 pm
The SCOTUS heard oral arguments this morning in the Indiana case of Ahmad Edwards v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 10:35 am
The core issue in Indiana v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 9:01 pm
., the Court is scheduled to hear argument in Indiana v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 8:38 am
Edwards - whether the same standard of competency applies to standing trial and representing oneself Florida Dept. of Revenue v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 4:00 pm
Edwards (07-208) on whether defendants found competent to stand trial maintain a right to self-representation, and in Florida Dept. of Revenue v. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 7:23 am
Updating this lengthy ILB entry from Jan. 24th, the Indiana Supreme Court decision in the case of Ahmad Edwards v. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (IPBiz),US: Two remaining challenged WARF embryonic stem cell patents upheld in ex parte reexamination: (Holman's Biotech IP Blog), Pharma & Biotech - ProductsAricept (Donepezil) – USV wins appeal against USPTO decision: (Spicy IP),Celerex (Celecoxib) – CAFC decision in Celebrex patents dispute between Pfizer and Teva will cut patent term by one and a half years: (Patent Baristas), Inersan – Ranbaxy in-licenses Inersan to CD Pharma to market in India and… [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 1:58 am
OR STATE GOVERNMENT WORKS [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
" Edward J. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 2:15 am
The United States Supreme Court, in the little known 1975 case of US v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 5:34 am
That said, a right of self-defense, especially in one's home, existed at common law as confirmed by the 1744 case of Mallock v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 8:09 am
Rothgery v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 3:09 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Khan & Ors v R [2008] EWCA Crim 531 (14 March 2008) Burgess, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 516 (08 February 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Manchester City Council v Benjamin [2008] EWCA Civ 189 (13 March 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Experience Hendrix LLC & anor v Times Newspapers Ltd [2008] EWHC 458 (Ch) (11 March 2008) Stow & Ors v Stow & Ors [2008] EWHC 495 (Ch) (14 March 2008)… [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 3:59 am
"Just one military example: United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:22 am
Solicitor General to take part in the argument on March 26 in Indiana v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 12:08 pm
, Chamber of Commerce v Brown (are state rules about the use of state funds preempted by the NLRA?) [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Arizona, 384 U.S. 43 (1966), and Edwards v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 2:11 am
In Tejador v. [read post]
