Search for: "Good v. Good"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 76,251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2012, 6:30 am
I have recently received a good bit of heated interest in my last two posts (here and here) on the Maryland Court of Appeals opinion in Tracey v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:30 am
I have recently received a good bit of heated interest in my last two posts (here and here) on the Maryland Court of Appeals opinion in Tracey v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 7:02 am
(Anemostat Products v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:57 am
Contract valid despite nonconformity Datec Electronics Holdings Ltd. and Another v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 3:28 am
Customer entitled to seek review Regina (UMBS Online Ltd.) v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 8:56 am
See, e.g., MGM v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 5:13 am
[The Board noted that "Because the goods listed in the third-party registrations are not identical or even closely related to the goods identified in the cited registration, these circumstances do not implicate Spireon, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 3:50 am
In the STAYER trade mark dispute, Case T-254/13 Stayer Ibérica, SA v OHIM, ZAO Korporaciya ‘Masternet’, the General Court provided useful guidelines on how to assess and prove that branded goods are complementary or in competition for the purposes of establishing their similarity and possibly the existence of a likelihood of confusion between their trade marks.This case regards an application for invalidity lodged by the Russian company Zao Korporaciya Masternet… [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 4:03 am
Ltd., Serial No. 79277754 (September 11, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas V. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 2:59 am
Cosmetic Warriors Limited v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 6:27 am
Jander Case SCOTUS Once Again Decides Not to Provide Guidance Regarding “More Harm Than Good” Standard Presented in Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:33 am
Hills Industries Limited v Bitek Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 94 ps The decision also addresses removal for non-use and infringement issues which, in view of the length of this post, will need to be the subject of a later post. [read post]
2 May 2008, 8:40 am
Ellis v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 3:08 am
" Jacobs v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 12:30 am
Canada Ontario Court of Appeals held in R v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:54 am
In Mayo v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
In Stockman v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:09 pm
In his dissent in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:08 am
In assessing whether a respondent’s use constitutes a bona fide offering of goods or services, the Panel in Zerospam Security Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 11:06 pm
Montblanc-Simplo GmbH v. [read post]
