Search for: "High v State"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 35,497
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2011, 3:19 am
Supreme Court McGowan (Procurator Fiscal) v B (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 54 (23 November 2011) Jude v Her Majesty’s Advocate (Scotland) (Rev 1) [2011] UKSC 55 (23 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Samarenko v Dawn Hill House Ltd [2011] EWCA civ 1445 (01 December 2011) Oso v Newham University Hospital NHS Trust [2011] EWCA Civ 1423 (01 December 2011) Francis v London Borough of Southwark [2011] EWCA Civ 1418 (01 December 2011) Proactive… [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:26 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Doyle & Ors v R [2012] EWCA Crim 995 (16 May 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Rehill v Rider Holdings Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 628 (16 May 2012) Sulamerica CIA Nacional De Seguros SA & Ors v Enesa Engenharia SA & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 638 (16 May 2012) Sucafina SA v Rotenberg [2012] EWCA Civ 637 (16 May 2012) JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov [2012] EWCA Civ 639 (16 May 2012) Durden v Aston [2012] EWCA Civ… [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 7:23 am
As Justice Felix Frankfurter famously noted in his dissent in Baker v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:48 am
The only difference here is that, instead of Peninsula’s search results directly stating the name Peninsula, they include the part name. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 10:51 am
(Eugene Volokh) Bateman v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 6:13 am
After someone wins or loses, the case then proceeds to state court.The case is In the Matter of AMG Managing Partners v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:18 am
So it was yesterday at the High Court in Washington, D.C. for argument in the case of United States v Texas, posing an important immigration policy question that tests the very limits of executive branch power.This case presented an evenly divided Court -down one justice following Justice Scalia's sudden death in February- with the task of passing muster on President Obama's innovative immigration policy; a series of recent executive directives made through the… [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 7:23 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:37 am
United States) Cóman Kenny, Prosecutor v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 11:20 am
Defendant then filed a motion for reconsideration, citing Byrd v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 8:29 pm
In the appropriately named Liberty v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 5:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 12:53 pm
Earlier this month, as reported on this blog, New York's high court ruled that a state law limiting marriage to between a man and a woman was constitutional in that state. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 6:41 pm
Bohling and then reinforced in 2004 in State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 4:07 pm
In the case of Piscioneri v Brisciani ([2015] ACTSC 106), the Australian Capital Territory Supreme Court found that the owner and administrator of online forumZGeek is liable for discussion on it, and awarded $82,000 damages to a lawyer defamed on the site. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
” [Reuters; opinion in Oakland v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:31 am
Gingrich v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 1:31 am
Part II contrasts this strict state of mind requirement with an even stricter standard applied later that year in Stone v. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 9:01 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 6:17 am
Pliego v. [read post]
