Search for: "I v. B"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 24,565
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2014, 9:03 am
I will provide a brief synopsis of all five. 1) Teresa Prewett v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 11:29 am
I further observe that ther [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 8:01 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 4:37 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 1:26 pm
Code 61:I.1130(B); the “Regulation”). [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
The CTA regulates “reporting company[ies],” defined as “corporation[s],limited liability company[ies], or other similar entit[ies]” that are either “(i) createdby the filing of a document with a secretary of state or a similar office under the lawof a State or Indian Tribe, or (ii) formed under the law of a foreign country andregistered to do business in the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 6:31 pm
Julce v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 3:26 am
UNISON’s appeal to the Supreme Court was born out of judicial review proceedings it initiated against the enactment of the Fees Order for (i) interfering unjustifiably with the right of access to justice under (a) common law and (b) EU law, (ii) for frustrating the operation of Parliamentary legislation granting employment rights; and (iii) for discriminating unlawfully against women and other protected groups. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 4:20 pm
On 30 March 2015, the Upper Tribunal gave judgment in the case of Department of Health v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:05 pm
I would, however, reduce those amounts to $175,000 to take into account the mitigation facts. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:45 pm
§ 7261(b)(2). [read post]
1 May 2011, 6:39 am
[B]ut we must draw lines as best we can ... [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:23 am
As I read the opinion, there are three key take-away points: The individual mandate is outside of Congress's power under the Commerce Clause & the Necessary and Proper Clause because (a) it is not itself a regulation of commerce, and (b) the decision not to purchase insurance is not "economic activity" that would trigger the substantial cumulative effects test of Wickard v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:22 am
NICHOLAS YEDINAK, Petitioner, v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 12:52 pm
What am I missing? [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:00 am
That's what I think Iqbal requires. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 12:16 pm
See R. 2:12-3(b). [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 12:59 pm
People v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm
§ 3.654(b) is a “necessary or appropriate” regulation. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm
§ 3.654(b) is a “necessary or appropriate” regulation. [read post]
