Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 4441 - 4460
of 13,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2010, 3:02 pm
Ignorance of the law is not a valid ground for re-establishment (see e.g. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 8:17 am
“What we’re doing here is similar in the sense that we’re managing a mountain of basically unstructured information — the PDFs in Docket Alarm,” Walters said. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
A request for re-establishment was refused.The applicant filed a complaint before epi on March 24, 2009. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 10:00 am
I am looking forward to participating in a conference, "Contested Collisions," convened by Dr. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 12:44 pm
E.g., if ALL of the CFCs’ profits are treated as deemed dividends to the parent, then the prior steps of applying CAA have been pretty much overridden. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
See, e.g., Cal. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 12:19 pm
A good deal of seemingly “anonymous” data may be linked to an individual—e.g., by connecting the dataset at hand with some other dataset. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 1:27 pm
But you're a contractor. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
See, e.g., In re Schwartz, 954 F. 2d 569, 571 (9th Cir. 1992) ( “. . . violations of the automatic stay are void . . . [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 6:51 am
See e.g In re Boesch and Slaney, 617 F.2d at 276-77, 205 USPQ 215, 219 (C.C.P.A. 1980) (citing In re Payne, 606 F.2d 303, 316, 203 USPQ 245, 256, (CCPA 1979), and cases cited therein) ("proof of unexpected properties may be in the form of direct or indirect comparative testing of the claimed compounds (here, alloys) and the closest prior art"); In re Blondel, 499 F.2d 1311, 1317, 182 USPQ 294, 298 (CCPA 1974). [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 6:51 am
See e.g In re Boesch and Slaney, 617 F.2d at 276-77, 205 USPQ 215, 219 (C.C.P.A. 1980) (citing In re Payne, 606 F.2d 303, 316, 203 USPQ 245, 256, (CCPA 1979), and cases cited therein) ("proof of unexpected properties may be in the form of direct or indirect comparative testing of the claimed compounds (here, alloys) and the closest prior art"); In re Blondel, 499 F.2d 1311, 1317, 182 USPQ 294, 298 (CCPA 1974). [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:34 am
And if a grand jury does return an indictment, it then becomes the role of the courts to decide the sufficiency of the indictment, see., e.g., United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 7:55 am
Though some wizened old curmudgeons sometimes risk flattery in the courtroom, e.g., "Good question, your Honor! [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 7:55 am
Though some wizened old curmudgeons sometimes risk flattery in the courtroom, e.g., "Good question, your Honor! [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 9:35 am
The good: Dealing with people up the chain from you (e.g., the owners, or, if you're a subcontractor, the prime contractor or upper tier subcontractors), this decision suggests that defective construction claims against asking for repair or replacements costs must be breach of contract claims. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 8:47 am
If you're not on it, your competition will be. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 9:00 am
If you’re going to ask people this, use terminology they can understand (e.g. were you injured on someone else’s property). [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 9:53 am
Import tariffs can be domestically popular, as a political matter, even when they’re good policy. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:54 am
The book examines the relationships between different systems (e.g. legal, political, creative, political) and analyses how the copyright regime has evolved, given that it has its basis in multiple of these systems, e.g. copyright gives legal protection of creative output and gives economic reward for that creative output. [read post]
