Search for: "JOHN DOES 1 -10" Results 4441 - 4460 of 9,149
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by David DePaolo
Rule 35(e) required in such circumstances the employee to return to the same QME to the extent possible.The WCAB said there's nothing in the statutes that could be interpreted to mandate a single QME evaluator -"Based upon our review of the relevant statutes and case law we hold that:(1) The Labor Code does not require an employee to return to the same panel QME for an evaluation of a subsequent claim of injury. (2) The requirement in Rule 35.5(e) that an employee return to the… [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:30 am by Tom Bolt
The implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) continues to move forward rapidly, with 7.1 million people signing up by April 1, 2014 through the exchanges created through the law. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 11:29 pm
This person does not ever appear to have been Shakespeare. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Does 1-88, 2013 US Dist. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 3:02 am
The Board also affirmed an alternative refusal based on Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness and lack of acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:38 pm by Shahram Miri
John decided that he wanted his only son, Jack Doe, to own the property albeit in a life estate form because Jack was largely irresponsible. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 9:49 am by Jonathan Bailey
In a 9-0 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that it does, sending the case back to the lower courts for a likely trial. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 9:40 am by Daniel Shaviro
  In other words, suppose there was an elasticity of 1 (or actually -1) for the utility loss per dollar of tax paid, as income rises. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:11 am by WSLL
Michael, Wyoming Attorney General; John D. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:35 pm
Defendants’ brief does not mention the individual capacity due process claim, let alone seek its dismissal…. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:16 pm by Jeff Gamso
It is settled law that a warrantless search of abandoned property does not violate the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 4:32 am
Here’s how Chief Justice John Roberts put it in Gonzales v. [read post]