Search for: "John L. Welch" Results 4441 - 4460 of 4,661
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2007, 5:15 am
"And so the Board affirmed the refusal to register pursuant to Sections 1, 2, 3, and 45 of the Lanham Act.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
29 May 2007, 6:16 pm
"And so this Applicant's decision to GO-FOR it turned out to be a no-go.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
28 May 2007, 4:35 am
Lee or otherwise associate the mark SL with his name.Consequently, the Board sustained the opposition.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
25 May 2007, 5:00 am
I have a feeling that this mark will be registered under Section 2(f).Text Copyright John L. [read post]
23 May 2007, 5:06 am
" Much of that article remains relevant, despite passage of the TDRA in 2006.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
18 May 2007, 4:51 am
"The Board therefore affirmed the Section 2(e)(1) refusal.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
15 May 2007, 8:16 pm
It seems to me that the dictionary definitions coupled with common sense should have sufficed.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
10 May 2007, 10:01 pm
"The Board was left with no doubt that NAIL CARE is generic for the identified goods.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
10 May 2007, 4:45 am
I just do not find SO SEXY to be similar enough to be likely to confuse.Text Copyright John L. [read post]