Search for: "Land v. United States" Results 4441 - 4460 of 6,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
United States, 10-9746 (ditto); and Wesevich v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:05 pm by PJ Blount
(a) Section 40117(l)(7) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking `August 2, 2010. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:35 pm
Kamara (left), Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the Republic of Liberia to the United Nations and the Chair of CSW56, opened the session in the General Assembly Hall with the delegates from the member states of the United Nations and representatives and observers from national, regional, and local organizations in attendance. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 6:27 am by Garrick Pursley
United States, that the government "has charged itself with moral obligations of the highest responsibility and trust" in "dealing with the Indians [and] should therefore be judged by the most exacting fiduciary standards." [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 5:10 am
The supremacy clause of the Constitution states "all Treaties. . . which shall be made. . . under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 5:07 pm
The ACLU won in state district court, lost in the Colorado Court of Appeals, and the case is now before the Colorado Supreme Court, as Taxpayers for Public Education v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:29 pm by Kevin Johnson
  After decades in the United States, he likely has little familiarity with the Philippines; most friends, family, and community no doubt are in the United States. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am by Charon QC
– “The great modern sandpit will now have to rein it in, tamed by knowledge that the whiff of a suggestion could land you in court” And… The Tweeting Lawyer has a view:  Lessons from #McAlpine v #Bercow Finally for today ( I will return on the morrow…perhaps…hopefully etc etc)… from Legal Cheek – a prolix and rather pompous statement from a young pupil barrister. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am by Charon QC
– “The great modern sandpit will now have to rein it in, tamed by knowledge that the whiff of a suggestion could land you in court” And… The Tweeting Lawyer has a view:  Lessons from #McAlpine v #Bercow Finally for today ( I will return on the morrow…perhaps…hopefully etc etc)… from Legal Cheek – a prolix and rather pompous statement from a young pupil barrister. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:11 pm
As an aside, United States v. 4.0 Acres of Land was an Arizona case, where the U.S. government condemned land to build a federal courthouse. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 5:54 am
Because the "Supremacy Clause" of the United States Constitution says so: "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land . . . . [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 8:35 am by Steve Lubet
   “The Ten Commandments,” says the Act, “are an important component of the moral foundation of the laws and legal system of the United States of American and of the State of Arkansas” and represent “a philosophy . . . that God has ordained civil government and has delegated limited authority to civil government. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm by Herbert Hovenkamp
For example, in United States v. [read post]