Search for: "M. B.1." Results 4441 - 4460 of 13,696
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2023, 10:17 pm by Marcel Pemsel
The examiner rejected the applications for lacking distinctiveness (Art. 7(1)(b) EUTMR). [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 9:49 am
"More developments in the private copy levies field are to be expected in 2015.Image 1  courtesy of Flickr Users Big Dubya under a CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 license Image 2  courtesy of Flickr User   randomix under a CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 license  [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 7:33 pm
There are several applicable hearsay exceptions, including: the statement was an excited utterance under FRE 803(2) or, the unavailable victim made the statement under belief of impending death under FRE 804(b)(2). [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 11:49 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Abbott's criminal-justice vetoes, and since I hadn't written anything on the subject yet, with her permission I'm re-posting it here. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
  Some factors:(1)  The Massachusetts insurance reform enacted in 2006 is widely considered the model for Obamacare. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 6:50 am
CISG 14(1): simple invitationComment traiter les contrats où 2 machines "consentent"? [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 2:54 am
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (T-T-A-B not Tee-tab) has scheduled seven (VII) oral hearings for the month of December 2018. [read post]
11 May 2024, 4:51 am by Jocelyn Bosse
This is because denominations are deemed generic, and consequently, Article 20(1)(b) of the UPOV Convention 1991 stipulates that:... no rights in the designation registered as the denomination of the variety shall hamper the free use of the denomination in connection with the variety, even after the expiration of the breeder’s right. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Romag should therefore be as good law for false advertising under §1125(a)(1)(B) as for trademark, but I’m not super surprised that courts are still intoning “trademark” as if that were somehow a sufficient distinction. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 4:18 am by David DePaolo
they're the ones that are ultimately responsible for our paychecks...), and c) get the injured back on the job.Here's Zachry's pointers:1) Nurses make medical decisions, not claims adjusters. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Feb. 1, 2016)  Sometimes it’s nice to see the law work itself pure, as a court clears out some plaintiff-postulated ambiguities in Rogers v. [read post]