Search for: "M. B.1." Results 4441 - 4460 of 13,696
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The plaintiff now moves the Court to reconsider its Order and Reasons, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 59(e) and Rule 60(b).I. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 5:30 am by Adam Thimmesch
Specifically, a new Section 164(b)(5) would eliminate the following taxes from the list provided above: (1) foreign real property taxes; (2) more than $10,000 (or $5,000 for married individuals filing a separate return) of state and local real property taxes; (3) all personal property taxes; and (4) all state and local income taxes. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 8:00 pm by Daniel Shaviro
Then look at section 1303 of the bill, which would amend section 164(b)(5) of present law. [read post]
Paintings in any other medium other than oil and tempera and over 50 years of age for which an individual export licence would be required, one would presume, would fall under the minimum monetary threshold of £65,000.[19] [1] The National Gallery (2017): Saved for the nation [Online] Available at: https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/about-us/press-and-media/press-releases/saved-for-the-nation-bellotto (accessed 10 September 2017). [2] Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport… [read post]
Paintings in any other medium other than oil and tempera and over 50 years of age for which an individual export licence would be required, one would presume, would fall under the minimum monetary threshold of £65,000.[19] [1] The National Gallery (2017): Saved for the nation [Online] Available at: https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/about-us/press-and-media/press-releases/saved-for-the-nation-bellotto (accessed 10 September 2017). [2] Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport… [read post]
Paintings in any other medium other than oil and tempera and over 50 years of age for which an individual export licence would be required, one would presume, would fall under the minimum monetary threshold of £65,000.[19] [1] The National Gallery (2017): Saved for the nation [Online] Available at: https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/about-us/press-and-media/press-releases/saved-for-the-nation-bellotto (accessed 10 September 2017). [2] Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport… [read post]
Paintings in any other medium other than oil and tempera and over 50 years of age for which an individual export licence would be required, one would presume, would fall under the minimum monetary threshold of £65,000.[19] [1] The National Gallery (2017): Saved for the nation [Online] Available at: https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/about-us/press-and-media/press-releases/saved-for-the-nation-bellotto (accessed 10 September 2017). [2] Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport… [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 8:00 am by Sarah Grant
[the] proceedings significantly” and could therefore be sanctioned pursuant to Rules 809(b)(1) and 809(c) of the Rules for Military Commissions (R.M.C.) and 10 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 7:58 am by Greg Daugherty
The Proposed Act also would eliminate Code Section 457(b) for non-governmental tax-exempt employers and also Code Sections 457(f) and 457A, again effective for services performed on and after Jan. 1, 2018. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 7:14 am by Dan Carvajal
[1]  For example, business tax reduction immediately increases retained earnings, which are part of national saving, even before considering the effect of the tax reduction on the expected return on new investment, which should boost the business’s desire to add to capital formation. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 9:47 am by Daniel Shaviro
I really don't like sounding that way - it literally makes me heartsick, but I find those provisions to be so bad, indefensible, and redolent of bad faith that I'm pretty much driven to it. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:45 am by Guest Bloggers
Section 1204(a)(3) of the bill wreaks the havoc here, stating: “Subchapter B of chapter 1 is amended . . . by striking subsection (d) of section 117. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 2:07 pm by Daniel Shaviro
I would presume that the answer is Yes, because (a) they're smart folks, would have spotted the issue, and would have needed to know how to estimate it, plus (b) the intent by the drafters appears to be quite clear. [read post]