Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 19,982
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2015, 6:08 am
I was led to believe it didn't even exist. . . . [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 8:39 am
(Freitag, pp. 7-8 and Exhibit B, p. 12, paragraph 6). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 9:56 pm
[Regarding step two:] [B]y the ’150 patent’s own terms, the claims do not recite any non-conventional equipment. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 4:54 am
In his view *it was clear from the Patents Act 1977 s.7(2) that a patentable invention was "property" and that the inventor was the first owner of that property unless one of the circumstances mentioned in s.7(2)(b) applied;* if s.7(2)(b) did apply, so that another person was entitled to the whole of the property in the invention before it was made, that other person was then entitled to apply for and be granted a patent, and if the inventor assigned the property in the… [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am
And the subject matter—“unilateralist presidencies and submissive legislatures”—is of great interest to me. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:10 pm
[yes, b/c you are representing legacy media, and Feist isn’t.]Kummer: countering emotional appeal of actors/players claiming rights over their digital avatars? [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 4:14 pm
b) This indemnification shall not apply to the following: i) liability, claims, and damages which are caused solely by the negligence or intentional misconduct of _________. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 5:31 am
Richmond (1982), the late Chief Judge Jack B. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:14 am
The judge began his analysis motion by explaining that[i]t is the plaintiff's burden to show that subject matter jurisdiction exists. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
“[T]he nature of the equitable,” Aristotle long ago observed, is “a correction of law where it is defective owing to its universality. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 12:59 pm
The court held that it ultimately doesn’t really matter for whose purposes a backup is made. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:13 am
There are many that I know about, and probably lots more that I don’t know about. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 10:13 am
[B.] [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 1:17 pm
It doesn’t matter if it’s morally wrong; it’s economically problematic. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 5:00 am
I would think that 25.5(b) ceases to apply in these circumstances. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 9:06 pm
Specifically, imagine a transaction in which funds are moving from A to D, but go through intermediary financial institutions B and C: A-->B-->C-->D. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:03 pm
Nontraditional subject matter may make determining scope less clear. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:06 pm
If you’d like more of my thoughts on the matter, check out Judicial Clerkships 101. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 6:28 am
While it is the position of the appellants that Section 34a is not self-executing, it really doesn’t matter because 34a provides for implementing legislation, and by its own terms R.C. 4111.14 was that implementing legislation. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 3:30 pm
As a policy matter, therefore, there might well be groups whose equities are thought to be strong enough to justify prosecutorial discretion but not at a level that would warrant deferred action. [read post]
