Search for: "MUSIC v. STATE"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 4,608
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2007, 10:35 am
In May of this year, the United States Supreme Court came down with the decision in Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 2:49 am
In contrast, Bill Robinson, a respected lawyer and representative of businesses in Russia since 1990, thinks that nationalization is an insignificant risk and one which is easily insurable.[32] Although there has been increasing state ownership in strategic sectors like aerospace, "national champions" of private industry such as energy and metals continue to grow alongside with these state giants. [33] Though the government is reasserting its position and… [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
See Romer v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 4:07 am
Rodriguez, the San Diego, California, default judgment case in which the RIAA's complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim.Interscope v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 6:47 am
Rodriguez, a judge has dismissed the RIAA's "boilerplate" complaint for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.I.e., the decision is in agreement with the defendants' arguments in Elektra v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 5:46 am
In response to the motion by Oklahoma State University students to vacate the ex parte discovery order obtained by the RIAA in Arista v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 4:29 pm
A later decision by the Ninth Circuit in Laws v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 3:32 am
"The lawsuit also accuses the association of violating state and federal racketeering laws.The complaint filed August 15 in U.S. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 9:49 am
The RIAA has responded to the defendants' submission of the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Latin American Music v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 7:24 pm
Now Larry Tribe is weighing in to cut off the debate, apparently arguing that virtually any regulation of the big carriers' treatment of content could violate the First Amendment (according to this report): Professor Tribe was asked . . . whether he thought broadband providers should be allowed to censor music lyrics critical of the President of the United States. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 4:16 am
This argument was recently repudiated by the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, in Latin American Music Co. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
State of Minnesota
• US v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 1:35 am
Sony-BMG Music Entertainment Inc. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 2:47 pm
In Sarl Louis Feraud International v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 11:23 am
In Atlantic v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 5:29 am
Judge Gould accomplishes the rare double-play, with last week's great decision in Yida (featured here) and this week's excellent opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 11:22 am
Consider the following hypothetical illustrations of a range of acts, and see which you think arise out of professional services or business activities: A dentist normally plays Mozart as background music in his office. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 4:50 pm
UMG v. [read post]
