Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 4441 - 4460
of 16,584
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2017, 9:13 am
So President Trump gets high marks on this one. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
Among other matters, it includes some relevant innovations as regards pharma patent’s compulsory licences, Katfriend Mark Summerfield explains.* "Are you sitting comfortably ...? [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:23 pm
No matter how many dots you try to connect, the TTAB isn’t going to buy any argument containing the words, “Webster’s online dictionary defines Budweiser as ‘the name of a style of lager beer (similar to pilsner) from the city of Ceské Budejovice in Bohemia (Czech Republic), brewed since 1265.'” There’s nothing generic or descriptive about BUDWEISER in this country, bud. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
It is certainly not a matter for recall or impeachment. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:49 am
The first step is to be sure that someone else hasn't already trademarked the name. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 7:00 am
The TTAB explains a matter of black-letter law: Applicant’s mark is PHILADELPHIA’S CHEESESTEAK and registrant’s marks are PHILADELPHIA CHEESESTEAK CO. and design, PHILADELPHIA CHEESESTEAK CO. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 6:51 am
The parents sought a hearing on the matter, and in September 2016, the court issued a written temporary care order. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 5:52 pm
Was this choice a matter of “national public interest? [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 3:52 pm
As a general matter, "[t]he more likely a mark is to be remembered and associated in the public mind with the mark's owner, the greater protection the mark is accorded by trademark laws. [read post]
2 May 2007, 8:12 pm
Stewart for that matter. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:01 pm
If lawyers can’t prove that, then the officer will received immunity and the lawsuit can be dismissed. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 10:58 am
Section 103 of the Patent Act focuses on “differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 7:28 am
… ‘[T]he payment or rejection of claims is a part of the regular business of an insurance company. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 3:53 am
Notably, the decision does not address the constitutionality of the accompanying language of the Act, which prohibits the registration of marks that consist of or include “immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 11:12 am
One of the great mysteries, still, as Daniel Goldberg noted in a comment to Rick's post, is the source of the scientist's hypothesis (see Hempel, Popper, and others, like Mark Turner and Mark Johnson, who write on categories, analogies, and metaphors). [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:59 am
She doesn't know if otter trade mark bodies (here the Pharmaceutical Trade Marks Group and ECTA, the European Communities Trade Mark Association, spring to mind) have amicus teams, though she thinks that the International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (AIPPI) may submit amicus briefs from time to time. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 2:34 pm
No matter the issue. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:19 pm
It goes from small matters to big strategic stuff. [read post]
20 May 2016, 10:07 am
Does interference w/TM interests matter any more than other deception? [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 12:28 am
They lied about the fund not being used for personal matters and then it paid their mortgage. [read post]
