Search for: "Operation Technology, Inc." Results 4441 - 4460 of 5,501
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2017, 12:23 am by Sander van Rijnswou
In the real world, there might be circumstances under which a business person might require some particular technology be used. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:41 am by Dave Maass
The Operation Slug Speed Award - U.S. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:07 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Under these new standards, for instance, Labor Department auditors have asserted and enforced joint employment liability under the FLSA based on evidence of limited indirect influence over working conditions arising out of the alleged joint employer business operations such as restriction of schedules resulting from access to the worksite restricted by the ordinary business hours of operations of the business or the business’ requirement that the employer and its worker… [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 6:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The February 4, 2022 complaint filed against New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. can be found here. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 7:56 am
Box 2364 Colorado Springs, CO 80901 Phone: (719) 633-1133 E-mail: info@csdsa.org Web: http://www.csdsa.org Mile High Down Syndrome Association, Inc. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
(IP Dragon)   Colombia Legal victory for Coca Cola over trade mark (IP tango)   Denmark Danish Supreme Court affirms decision forcing food stall operator using ORIENTEXPRESSEN to change her trade mark (Class 46)   Europe Questions on acquiescence for ECJ in Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EWHC questions referred to ECJ in L'Oréal SA v eBay now available on Curia (Class 46) Disruptive innovations:… [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 2:54 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Stamer publishes and speaks extensively on these and other staffing and human resources, compensation and benefits, technology, health care, privacy, public policy, and other operations and risk management concerns. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am by INFORRM
Ten months on from the 13 May 2014 ruling of the Grand Chamber of the European Court in Case C131-12 Google Spain SL, Google Inc v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD), Mario Costeja Gonzalez, Google has received 234, 384 requests for removal of links and evaluated 850, 385 URLs. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:40 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
  There’s also all kinds of interesting inside-baseball going on here, from the curious fact that Samsung is one of the largest suppliers of iPhone and iPad components to the role of Google as the wizard behind the curtain because its Android operating system underlies Samsung’s user interface. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged two co-founders of Centra Tech, Inc., (Centra) a purported financial services start-up, with orchestrating a fraudulent initial coin offering (ICO), a term that is meant to describe the offer and sale of digital assets issued and distributed on a blockchain, that raised more than $32 million from thousands of investors. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
In recent decades, due to technology, copyright law has increasingly had to deal with a similar question. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 12:01 pm
Embassies in Beijing and Manila; Vice President of Motorola International, Inc.; and a consultant to The Carter Center’s China Village Elections Project. [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:53 pm by Keith Jones
United Airlines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999) (held that plaintiffs were not disabled under the ADA because corrective mitigating  measures must be taken into account when determining if someone is impaired) and in Toyota Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
In 2016, Forbes reported that roughly 60% of its Fortune 500 companies committed to procuring renewable energy for corporate operations coinciding with California’s RPS benchmarks. [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:53 pm by Keith Jones
United Airlines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999) (held that plaintiffs were not disabled under the ADA because corrective mitigating  measures must be taken into account when determining if someone is impaired) and in Toyota Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]