Search for: "People v High"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 15,044
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2019, 8:05 am
In Nielsen v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 7:14 am
Under Picard v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 4:35 am
The 60-page complaint (with over 400 pages of attachments and exhibits) (full text) in Dechter v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:00 am
Roosevelt was particularly upset by the Court’s 1935 decision in Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:13 pm
[SCJ, paras. 232-234] He recognized that sexual harassment could ground damages for intentional infliction of mental distress, but citing Perell J.A. in High Parklane Consulting Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 8:27 am
The case that changed all this came out in June 2018: Koons v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 8:15 am
Supreme Court ruled police and other enforcement agencies require a search warrant to open a phone confiscated during an arrest in the case of Riley v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:17 pm
Close scrutiny of any proposed social media duty of care from a rule of law perspective can help ensure that we make good law for bad people rather than bad law for good people. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:48 am
Louisiana.The high court also took up the case of Kansas v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 7:55 am
People v. [read post]
16 Mar 2019, 4:32 am
It compounds, rather than cures, the vice.Close scrutiny of any proposed social media duty of care from a rule of law perspective can help ensure that we make good law for bad people rather than bad law for good people. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 1:45 pm
In Marshall v. [read post]
Exigent Circumstances: What They Are and How They Allow Police to Search and Seize Without a Warrant
15 Mar 2019, 11:46 am
The enticement of labelling a situation as “exigent circumstances” can run high. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:44 am
In Gamble v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:00 am
The Farm Bill should expand hemp extracts with a high amount of CBD. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 11:37 am
” The organization purports to help the education of high risk youths, and it claims that “100% of the net proceeds go to the kids. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:41 am
People v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
People want these protections provided by that professional status of a lawyer. [read post]
