Search for: "People v J."
Results 4441 - 4460
of 7,244
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am
In a decision akin to that delived by the Court of Appeal, a Queensland Magistrate has helped set out the test for domestic violence cases under that State's Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 2012. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
Writing at The Huffington Post, Ryan J. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 6:46 am
Summers, 452 U.S. at 709 (Stewart, J., dissenting).Correctly, he noted that if the police detain people without probable cause for the purpose of arresting them once they establish probable cause, this is really a trip down the rabbit hole. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
The CourtStanding to Challenge US Wiretapping Law Denied: Clapper, Director of National Intelligence et al v Amnesty International USA et al On 26 February 2013, the United States Supreme Court (USSC) ((568 US) (2013)) upheld the federal law that enables the government to perform surveillance on Americans’ phone and email communications with people outside the United States. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 8:45 am
District Judge Terry J. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 3:27 am
If Wilson J’s views were followed to their logical conclusion the wife would have marks deducted when it came to a contribution based assessment. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
But in Coleman v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 4:15 pm
§ 204.6(j)(4)(i)(B), demonstrating an expectation that EB-5 projects will generally create jobs within such a timeframe." [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 9:36 am
(The analogy made me think of J. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 8:42 pm
Moving on further, Aparajita highlighted the Bombay High court’s recent decision on Trademark infringement of SABMiller India Ltd. v/s Som. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 2:53 pm
And you’ve never had experience with her making up lies about people before. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 2:53 pm
And you’ve never had experience with her making up lies about people before. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm
J. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am
It’s clear that Mr Waterson’s expenses claims have upset many people in Eastbourne. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 7:20 am
The orders I granted in Dramatico v Sky are likely to have been less easy to circumvent than the original order made in 20C Fox v BT (No 2) [...]. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 8:33 pm
Holder with Fisher v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 4:03 pm
CTB v NGN [2011] EWHC 1232, in which Eady J prevented publication of the name of Ryan Giggs as the premiership footballer who had been in a relationship with Imogen Thomas. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 12:52 pm
Ryan J. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 10:15 am
, Steiker, J. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
It would be odd and potentially onerous if, even while the authority were simply considering the merits of the claimant’s position, they were unable to house the family in two adjoining units even on a temporary basis.Further, Scott Baker J in R v Ealing London Borough Council ex parte Surdonja [1999] 1 ALL ER 566 took the view that:“In my judgment the obligation is not discharged by providing split accommodation in separate dwellings. [read post]
