Search for: "Peoples v. Peoples"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 72,913
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2013, 7:37 am
Strickland v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 7:58 am
Chatham Area Transit v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 12:58 pm
People v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 10:48 am
The Supreme Court of California ruled that balance billing is not allowed in the state in Prospect Health Source Medical Group, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 3:31 pm
They are built by people coming together, organizing groups, drafting rules, buying and selling goods and services, and in the process distinguishing just from unjust practices. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
This distinction is difficult to grasp, hence this series of mini-exercises.Problem 5The statement:To prove that it was raining on a particular day in Manhattan, a witness testifies that most people outside were using umbrellas.Is the witness’s testimony considered hearsay? [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 10:36 am
S. v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:14 pm
On May 3, 1954,the Supreme Court issued its decision on Hernández v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:33 pm
Reasonable people should know that whenever you get a prescription filled, any law enforcement officer -- or any administrative officer with the state -- is entitled to know upon request what drugs you take. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:18 pm
Various people indicated that the most likely person to have done this was Mr. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 11:55 am
We just can't have people of your type in our country. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 4:07 pm
Despite the fact that he made tons of people lose money, continues to deny responsibility, and transferred assets to his ex-wife to attempt to avoid his restitution obligations.Be glad it was Judge Hatter instead of me. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:34 pm
One of the upsides of having very smart people on a court is that they can not only resolve particular cases, but also examine more broadly whether existing doctrine seems right and, if it's not, what went wrong (and when).It seems pretty clear that Judge Berzon's going to call for en banc review. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 11:46 am
However, the primary reason why people refrain from such action is concern relating to the cost. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:43 pm
There's some useful stuff in this opinion about alter ego liability and adding nonparties as judgment debtors, so on the doctrinal front, it's worthy of a read.As for extra-legal lessons learned, I might suggest that one of them might be that if you're planning on getting together with a partner to make usurious loans to poor people over the Internet, it should perhaps not come as a surprise to you when your partner eventually tries 9allegedly) to steal from you; e.g., by… [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 11:42 pm
People v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm
Peterson, supra; People v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:10 pm
Now on January 5th, 2010, CYBERsitter LLC sued the following Chinese, Taiwanese and Japanese parties:The People's Republic of China ("a foreign state", as can be read in the original lawsuit)Zhengzhou Jinhui Computer System Engineering Ltd.Beijing Dazheng Human Language Technology Academy Ltd.Sony CorporationLenovo Group LimitedToshiba CorporationAcer IncorporatedASUSTeK Computer Inc.Benq CorporationHaier Group CorporationDOES 1-10The complaint at… [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 5:51 pm
December 2nd was a bad day for several people: (1) California attorney Andrew Dimitriou (see yesterday's post); (2) non-California attorney John Brown (albeit in 1859); and (3) California quasi-attorney Harold Sullivan.The last of these three had a $3.1 million foreign judgment against him (issued by the Supreme Court of Gibraltar, no less) affirmed by the California Court of Appeal. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:44 pm
Martinez v. [read post]
