Search for: "R. MORALES"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 15,256
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2015, 1:36 pm
– When applying, you must provide documented evidence that you have changed your ways proving your good moral character, this will not guarantee your visa approval, it can only help strengthen your application – You may be able to obtain a tourist visa if you first file the 212(d)(3) Nonimmigrant Waiver For further questions please call our office. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 7:24 am
," which focuses on law as it is, as opposed to morality, revolution, and disobedience.I'm using my tag "civil disobedience," even though Sasha Volokh eschews the adjective and speaks only of "disobedience. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 10:08 am
Second, the general public sees the law as good measure of morality. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 10:08 am
Second, the general public sees the law as good measure of morality. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
It’s Hard to Measure https://t.co/phkXQiT7kE via @itifdc -> No expectation of privacy in subscriber information, R. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 9:12 pm
Guy Fiti Sinclair (Victoria Univ. of Wellington - Law) has posted The International Civil Servant in Theory and Practice: Law, Morality, and Expertise. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 3:22 am
Marion County Judge Vance Day "made a decision nearly a year ago to stop doing weddings altogether, and the principal factor that he weighed was the pressure that one would face to perform a same-sex wedding, which he had a conflict with his religious beliefs," a spokesman told AP.The issue of same-sex weddings is "the weightiest" of several allegations against Day that are being investigated by the Commission on Judicial Fitness and Disability, [the spokesman] said....Last… [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 1:06 pm
The Appellate Division affirmed the trial court’s decision, reasoning that the mother’s moral outrage was likely shared by the broader community. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:59 am
Can your religion legally excuse you from doing part of your job? [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
A judge may not decline to perform all marriages in order to avoid marrying same-sex couples based on his or her personal, moral, or religious beliefs. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
A judge may not decline to perform all marriages in order to avoid marrying same-sex couples based on his or her personal, moral, or religious beliefs. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
A judge may not decline to perform all marriages in order to avoid marrying same-sex couples based on his or her personal, moral, or religious beliefs. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
A judge may not decline to perform all marriages in order to avoid marrying same-sex couples based on his or her personal, moral, or religious beliefs. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 8:37 am
Bottom line: I’m fine continuing to criticize Davis on substantive moral grounds. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 5:22 am
UPDATE: I also heartily recommend Judge Pryor’s “Moral Duty and the Rule of Law,” from the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 11:50 pm
Even if it isn’t it gives me a more impressive sounding argument at the next rained off BBQ than promoting the morality of anyone having control over another person’s home. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 7:49 pm
In the meantime, Davis had an honorable path out of her personal moral dilemma. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 2:09 pm
The district judge rejected the state RFRA defense on the ground that state law imposes only a “slight” burden on her religious freedom because issuing marriage licenses does not “condone same-sex unions on moral or religious grounds, nor” does it prevent “her from engaging in a variety of religious activities” such as church attendance, Bible study, and the maintenance of her belief in the immorality of same-sex marriage. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:45 pm
And she gets to be true to her religious duties as well -- a bonus for those who are Christian.This is not, as the ACLU and other secular henchmen would portray it, "Christians imposing their morality on the rest of us. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 2:21 pm
When it comes to political ignorance, neither major party can claim the moral high ground. [read post]
