Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 19,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2014, 12:29 pm
” marks a welcome exception in the academic literature. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 11:18 am
See, e.g., Smith v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 8:15 am
Supreme Court ruled in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 1:59 pm
The State was not, however, required to allege what measures it would have taken had the wholesaler disclosed the true basis for its “unilateral” actions.Utah alleged that the wholesaler’s fraud, rather than any other factor, had caused its reimbursement rates to increase, and that was sufficient.The decision is State of Utah v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 6:33 pm
Part V then considers the way Western secular states have facilitated this new role for religion in places like Afghanistan. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 9:21 am
Every year, the first Monday in October marks the beginning of a new term. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Count V: Trademark Infringement - Apple has a bunch of trademarks. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:05 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 6:38 am
” (Monasky v Taglieri, 589 US —, —, 140 S Ct 719, 727 [2020] [internal quotation marks omitted].) [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 3:55 am
Stitt and United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 4:02 am
Velosolex America owns a U.S. trade mark "VS VELOSOLEX" since 2002 and distributes the "Black n Roll" Solex in the United States under the trade mark "Velosolex". [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:57 pm
Under Breuer v. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 1:01 am
Supreme Court, he heard the case Brown v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
Facts: This case (Goode v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:44 am
I use a lot of ‘possibly’s and ‘maybe’s because we also don’t know for sure what the state of the Chinese register was in December 2009, and what an investigation of the Chinese register would have produced at that time. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 9:57 am
ShareWednesday’s argument in Vidal v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 6:54 am
Art 104 of the Regulation states:(1) A Community trade mark court hearing an action referred to in Article 96 [i.e. counterclaims for revocation/declaration of invalidity], other than an action for declaration of non-infringement, shall, unless there are special grounds for continuing the hearing, of its own volition, after hearing the parties, or at the request of one of the parties and after hearing the other party, stay the proceedings where the validity of the Community trade… [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 3:00 am
Barrington Music Products, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 4:34 pm
A recent Trademark Trial and Appeals Board opinion in Central Garden & Pet Co. v. [read post]
