Search for: "State v. Parks"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 10,192
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2014, 7:04 am
The court cited LinkAmerica Corp. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:37 am
In State v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am
United States, which asks whether stock options are taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act, and Chavez-Meza v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Park, New York, for the American Civil Liberties Union, Women's Rights Project, amicus curiae. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Park, New York, for the American Civil Liberties Union, Women's Rights Project, amicus curiae. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
Ind. 1999); Parks v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:22 am
This is not to suggest that the State Council, as the delegated institutional organ charged by the vanguard with the task of relating the task of overcoming the current principal contradiction in its "human rights" aspects, were not looking over their shoulder at how the rest of the world would read and interpret the document. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 8:43 am
In State v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 8:15 pm
United States Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote on behalf of the Court in the case of Troxel v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 7:05 am
Miranda Holdings, Inc v Town Board of Town of Orchard Park, 2017 WL 2884633 (NYAD 4 Dept. 7/7/2017)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Environmental Review [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 8:00 am
Beauchamp v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:13 am
The justices issued an opinion yesterday in Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:35 am
Howard Piltch et al. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 9:52 am
The church argued at trial that based on the 1952 state supreme court ruling in Sexton v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:53 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0261p.06 2007/07/11 Parks v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
