Search for: "State v. Sessions" Results 4441 - 4460 of 5,723
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2019, 11:10 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Against the odds, and the wishes of police unions, HB 2754 (White) limiting arrests for fine-only Class-C misdemeanor violations is scheduled for a floor vote in the Texas House tomorrow (though it's about 100 bills down on the calendar, and so could be pushed til Tuesday).The legislation has its roots in the US Supreme Court case, Atwater v. [read post]
The presentation canvassed a series of issues in the debate regarding appropriate responses, including: state v. federal responses; private ordering v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 4:44 am by INFORRM
You stated that the newspaper had paid police officers for information. [read post]
19 Dec 2024, 5:30 am by centerforartlaw
” Similarly, museums are governed by each state’s attorney general, with a mission and obligations to their stakeholders. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm by Rena Steinzor
Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced that when the U.S. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
During a Q&A session at the conference, Cliona Kimber posed a question about the levels of damages that may be available under DPD or GDPR for infringement of data protection rights. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:00 am by Marie Louise
Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics (Pharma Patents) US: CAFC Affirms district court de novo review in section 146 action: Streck v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 10:53 am
  It also throws an important light on the issue of the structures for constraining the use of police power in states that may be useful, especially perhaps for those confronting similar issues in the United States (see, e.g., here and here). [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Scotland The Court of Session (Lord Clark) handed down judgment in the case of Wildcat Haven Enterprises v Wightman [2020] Scot CS CSOH 30. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 1:13 pm by Elizabeth A. Khalil
Jan 4: Attorney General Jeff Sessions withdrew the Department of Justice (DOJ) guidance on federal law enforcement priorities regarding state-legal cannabis activities, throwing into question how federal prosecutors will approach such activities in the future. [read post]