Search for: "State v. So "
Results 4441 - 4460
of 117,863
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
United States? [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
Wrongfully sinking or destroying a vessel at sea or attempting to do so; (c). [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 3:07 pm
A couple of other circuits have held otherwise, so now there's a circuit split. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:41 am
In Neary v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:28 am
Upton, a capital habeas case so old that it is governed by the pre-1996 rules for how a federal court should treat state-court findings. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 11:39 am
Bame v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:17 pm
The state Supreme Court ordered wrong precinct votes (because of poll worker error) to be counted under state law, but the federal courts are saying that doing so would violate the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
Fulmer v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
Corp., 84 NY2d 488; Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d at 225; and Matter of Data Tree, LLC v Romaine, 9 NY3d 454, at 463). [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
Corp., 84 NY2d 488; Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d at 225; and Matter of Data Tree, LLC v Romaine, 9 NY3d 454, at 463). [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 3:28 pm
Indiana v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:21 am
(Eugene Volokh) From the amicus brief for 48 states plus D.C. supporting Snyder in Snyder v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:41 pm
The United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in the case of Jerman v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:31 am
§ 1491(a)(2).63 IT IS SO ORDERED. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 7:12 pm
Barr v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 2:30 pm
So are their attorneys. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 2:28 pm
” United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
As the Supreme Court said in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 11:19 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V A fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered under the provisions hereof when, by lapse of time, he is exempt from prosecution or punishment for the crime or offence for which the surrender is asked, according to the laws of the country from which the extradition is demanded, or when his extradition is asked for the same crime or offence for which he has been tried, convicted or acquitted in that country, or so long as he is under prosecution for the same. [read post]