Search for: "State v. South"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 11,013
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2013, 3:13 am
Legal in South Africa?' [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 6:32 am
See Wainwright v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:00 pm
See, State v. [read post]
4 May 2025, 1:39 am
Delivering this unanimous decision, Justice Sotomayor confirmed the restrictive approach to cases involving foreign states inaugurated in 2021 by Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 7:00 am
The first case heard and decided by the Federal Circuit after its creation was South Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 10:32 am
The panel ordered the state to draw a new map. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:30 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in South Dakota v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:16 pm
" Â Brief of the United States of America Amicus Curiae Supporting Defendant-Appellees, at 21, Khulumani v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 11:35 am
Two Accidents on a Busy Highway The accident that injured the plaintiff in the case of Ready v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 8:14 am
The Plaintiff Slips in a Hotel Bathroom The plaintiff in the case of Goodwin v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 2:20 pm
District Court for South Dakota and Judge David Hansen on the Eighth Circuit. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 6:03 am
John v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 4:27 am
In the Courts Australia Brown v Kirkpatrick [2020] SASC 5, the Supreme Court of South Australia heard a defamation appeal and awarded AUS$3,500 to the plaintiff. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 7:43 am
The plaintiff in the case of Peden v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
The success of these efforts is best indicated by the Republican Party’s share of the South Carolina vote in presidential elections during that decade, which dropped from 58,071 in 1880 to 13,740 in 1888.[6] South Carolina was notable because African-Americans constituted close to sixty percent of the population of the state, but other southern states also followed suit in disenfranchising this population, amending their… [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 10:26 am
NFP criminal opinions today (8): In State of Indiana v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:34 pm
South African trade mark law quo wadis (where are going)? [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 9:11 am
Simon v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:33 am
The Court particularly discussed the decision of the Supreme Court of Louisiana in South Central Bell Telephone Co v Barthelemy 643 So 2d 1240 (Lou 1994) which held software to be not only property, but tangible property. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
At Governing, Daniel Vock reports that during Tuesday’s oral argument in South Dakota v. [read post]
