Search for: "Stephens v State" Results 4441 - 4460 of 6,367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2020, 1:48 am by Sophie Corke
In line with Lord Justice Jacob’s point in Actavis v Merck, the Court of Appeal stated that – in certain circumstances – there is nothing inventive about routinely-taken steps even if the actual outcome had not been predicted. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  Stephen Skowronek and Karen Orren might use the phrase “intercurrence” to describe their relationship. [read post]
22 Apr 2025, 9:05 pm by renholding
  After the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 2:51 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, in a seven-page opinion joined by Justices Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 3:48 am by SHG
Stephens, Cause 4:2013CV02923, SD Tex.; and Bernard v. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 9:27 am
Thanks– (From Stephen in Nevada) ANSWER: Text of Law — 18 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 9:09 am by ACLU
States like Maine will be a haven for abortion access if Roe v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 1:14 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Thus, a timely protest is an essential prerequisite for relief under a CPL 330.30 (1) claim of an error of law, unless the error has deprived the defendant of a fundamental right akin to People v Davidson, People v Padro and People v Antommarchi. [read post]