Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws" Results 4441 - 4460 of 55,049
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 7 February 2023, the Federal Court of Australia found in favour of Papua New Guinea energy minister William Duma in the case of Duma v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (No 3) [2023] FCA 47. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:56 am by Russell Knight
Most people would simply prefer to be finished with their ex-spouse instead of paying their ex-spouse monthly or, conversely, the ex-spouse hoping they will be paid every month. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:15 pm by Lawrence Solum
I argue that, as a general rule, the right to religious liberty should not be interpreted to mandate exemptions from general laws that are intended to protect the civil rights of other people, such as same-sex couples who seek goods and services in places of public accommodation. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 2:10 pm by Jillian Houle
Despite national expectations of a nonpartisan, unpolitical SCOTUS, the reality is that SCOTUS Justices are people just like anyone else. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 12:33 pm by Jennifer Dalven
Laws banning abortion are now in effect in more than a dozen states, denying more than 20 million people of reproductive age access to essential health care. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
The event will feature panels on official accountability—including an appearance from one of the plaintiffs in Monroe v. [read post]
Recognized analogous grounds under section 15(1) include sexual orientation (Egan v Canada), citizenship status (Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia), and marital status (Miron v Trudel). [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 7:13 am by Jeff Welty
The Associated Press reports here on the aftermath of Ramirez v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:55 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Do we have people thinking about how to sue Fox News, pundits, and political candidates for their lies? [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by Zoe Stern
” A federal judge in Oklahoma ruled that a federal law prohibiting people who use marijuana from owning firearms is unconstitutional for violating the Second Amendment. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am by Eden Winlow (Bristows)
However, the Chinese Supreme People’s Court has confirmed that the Chinese courts have jurisdiction to hear the case, even in the absence of agreement between the parties as to the forum in which terms are to be determined and without any patent infringement claim. [read post]
Pikeville’s notices informed people that possession of a firearm while on school property violated federal law. [read post]