Search for: "United States Department of Commerce"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 5,286
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2010, 4:27 pm
We kick off our month long celebration of Bayh-Dole with an exclusive interview with the chief architect of the legislation — The Honorable Birch Bayh, a former three-term United States Senator from the State of Indiana. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 6:53 pm
That’s 645 million people — double the population of the United States and nearly 20 times the population of Canada. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:49 am
Data from the departments of Commerce, Energy (DOE), State, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) contain gaps and in some cases were not sufficiently detailed for GAO's reporting purposes. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:13 am
The State Department is very supportive of U.S. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 11:27 am
" This could set up a contentious and public policy battle between the United States Department of Commerce and the United States Department of Justice. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:00 am
Department of Housing and Urban Development. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 7:15 pm
Regis Mohawk Tribe; Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources; Missouri Department of Conservation; New York State Department of Environmental Conservation; Pennsylvania Game Commission; Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife; and Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 8:08 am
The decision reflects the irony that while independence is an important criterion for membership, that independence means that the United States is now represented in international privacy discussions by the FTC, rather than the Departments of Commerce or State, which typically represent the country in international fora. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 6:26 pm
The bill was signed by President Washington on April 10, 1790 and the United States Patent System was established. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 6:33 pm
Harvey Leroy Sossamon III is a prisoner in the Robertson Unit of Texas state prison system, in Abilene. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 1:02 pm
The $600 million resolution of the civil case is being paid to: the United States ($436,440,000.00); Medicaid Participating States ($163,560,000.00); and the Relator (approximately $97 million plus interest). [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 3:38 pm
The parties disagreed on whether certain "questionnaires" sent out by the Department of Commerce were "questionnaires" covered by Article 12.1.1. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:15 am
The United States contends that GSK sold certain batches, lots or portions of lots of drugs, the strength of which differed materially from, or the purity or quality of which fell materially below, the strength, purity or quality specified in the drugs’ FDA applications or related documents. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 1:42 pm
The representatives will be selected by the governors of each gulf state and then appointed by President Obama, along with one senior official from each of several federal agencies, including the departments of Defense, Justice, Interior, Agriculture, Commerce and Transportation. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:06 am
The Obama Administration on August 26 proposed fourteen regulatory changes in the Department of Commerce’s Import Administration, including seven aimed directly at non-market economies and one that would make the products of state-owned enterprises almost automatically subject to allegations of unfair subsidies. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
United StatesDocket: 09-1554Issue(s): 1) Whether the Supreme Court's decision in Yeager v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
Department of Commerce's U.S. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:00 pm
Instead, the very best outcome here is (i) the mutual resolution of the matter through bilateral consultations or (ii) a WTO case adjudicated by an independent panel of arbiters (unlike the, ahem, sympathetic US Department of Commerce or USTR). [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 6:44 pm
One argument is that the United States forced Japan to act against its own interests in accepting a stronger yen. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 2:42 pm
Ed. 579 (1819), to United States v. [read post]
