Search for: "University Oral " Results 4441 - 4460 of 6,764
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2012, 4:08 am by David J. DePaolo
The state Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case on July 10 and numerous amicus briefs have also been filed including those by the Georgia Self-Insurers Association, Georgia Manufacturers Association, Georgia Poultry Federation, the Dougherty County School System, YKK (USA) Inc., the Georgia Association of Manufacturers, the Georgia Trial Lawyers Association and University of Georgia School of Law Professor Thomas Eaton. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:36 pm by Lyle Denniston
University of Texas — for Wednesday, October 10. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:01 pm by Howard Knopf
  For example, the Court ruled that "private study" does not mean simply "study by oneself" and put to rest the misinterpretations of the 1916 University of London decision that have caused so much mischief in Canada until now. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 7:45 pm by Dwight Sullivan
In Brissette, CAAF upheld AFCCA’s favorable ruling without even hearing oral argument. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 4:16 pm
A spokeswoman for Nutriceuticals Inc., manufacturer of Oxytocin Factor, said the doctors on the show didn't use the product as directed; it’s delivered via either nasal spray or oral drops. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:21 pm by royblack
” Perhaps in some alternate universe, but not this one. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:59 pm by Nathan McMurray
Some of the things he said include suggestions that the low birth rate problem could be resolved by swapping oral contraceptives with aphrodisiacs and broadcasting pornographic films every night. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:34 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
The assigned reviewers will provide oral feedback and then the rest of the audience will be invited to participate in offering feedback and asking questions. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:20 am by Vikram Raghavan
The second premise is that in some cases, oral or written statements can be relied upon but only for the purpose of identification or comparison with facts and materials that are already in the possession of the investigators. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:37 am by Oona Hathaway
  One of the toughest moments for the petitioners in the first round of oral argument in Kiobel v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 7:02 am by Philip Favro
It is remarkable to observe the legal world chip away at the landmark opinion of Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:02 am by boston
I’ve pointed out that Barton, who is not a historian (he holds a degree in Christian education from Oral Roberts University), is just a far-right political activist who twists history to suit his partisan ends. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Next week at the Leveson Inquiry Oral Hearings in relation to Module 4 of the Inquiry will continue on Monday 16 July 2012. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 12:00 am
(A 1966 oral history interview of Craig is here.) [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:04 am by Sarah Cleveland
Efforts at local justice in that case proved futile, and as Justice Kennedy observed at oral argument, “the only place they could sue was in the United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 3:24 am by Robert Kraft
” In fact, “Fordham University Law Professor Abner Greene said the majority appeared to leave open the possibility of a law that would penalize lies about valor if they were shown to be a basis for fraud or monetary gain. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:52 pm by Donald Childress
Royal Dutch Petroleum symposium is written by Trey Childress, Associate Professor of Law at the Pepperdine University School of Law and a Visiting Associate Professor of Law at the Washington & Lee University School of Law during the 2012-2013 academic year. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:56 am by Vikram Raghavan
Speaking for a unanimous bench, Jagannadhadas, J. famously held that, “[t]o be a witness is nothing more than to furnish evidence … indeed, every positive volitional act which furnishes evidence is testimony”, making it clear that oral and documentary evidence could come within the confines of Art 20(3). [read post]