Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2011, 4:21 pm
" True, but I don't think a high degree of sophistication is required to make this type of source distinction. [read post]
14 May 2012, 12:49 pm
If you don’t want blood on your hands, support repeal of the death penalty. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm
Taney didn't do it, but, if one can accept Story's similarly-motivated opinion in Prigg v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 3:26 pm
The usual outs to the First Amendment defenses to defamation law are not there (not only is there no actual malice, since on all evidence the defendants don't know the claims are false/aren't acting with reckless disregard, there might even be problems with the old-fashioned fact/opinion dichotomy).All that's left is some sense that protesting a funeral is somehow particularly icky, such that we're… [read post]
3 May 2007, 2:45 pm
Cop: No sir, the waiver form is so simple they don't even need to teach you how to use it.Jack [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 12:35 pm
Chris made an elegant point: "Isolated DNA" must not be markedly different from DNA in the body because when a woman sends a blood sample to Myriad to find out if she has a mutation that puts her at increased risk for cancer, Myriad gives her results about the DNA in her body; they don't say, "We found a mutation in the DNA we isolated from your blood, but that's different from the DNA in your body, so we… [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:29 am
I don't see how it's not at least negligent homicide. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 5:20 pm
Don't make it an afterthought. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 6:53 am
I don't know how you treat your other clients but if you treat them how you treated us then I feel sorry for them. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:22 am
Now while it worked out in the defendants' favor in the Florida situation, that's not always going to be the case - particularly when judges don't catch the jurors in these kind of activities. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 11:36 am
We don't need to reach the constitutional residency question because, either way, the State didn't introduce evidence that Teising acted with the criminal intent required for theft—evidence that she believed she wasn't supposed to continue collecting her salary for the work she kept performing remotely. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 11:21 am
It's not clear if she's a public defender. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:59 pm
” The central question on this appeal is whether public construction of an enormous oceanfront beach dune, for which plaintiff condemned an easement on defendants' land, conferred a special benefit on defendants' beach front property in Harvey Cedars. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 2:42 pm
Don't we hire lawyers to represent our interests in court? [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 6:00 am
The judge dismissed the case, ordering the plaintiffs to pay the defendant’s legal costs. 3: Piracy Survey: 39% of U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 4:15 am
"As a prosecutor, I don't really need to know why," Russoniello said. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:34 pm
First rule of law club is you don't talk about law club.1. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 12:30 pm
Besides, qualified immunity means we don't judge officers' actions with the benefit of hindsight. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:12 am
He probably would've been better off noting the details we had about Nguyen's restricted movement that we didn't have in Herrera. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:00 am
If you find yourself accused of or charged with a crime, don't hesitate to contact the experienced Colorado Springs sex crime defense lawyers at The Bussey Law Firm, P.C. [read post]
