Search for: "Weeks v. United States"
Results 4441 - 4460
of 19,098
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2009, 4:05 am
"Well, my old colleague and mentor would probably be pleased about the United States Supreme Court's decision this past week in Ashcroft v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
In its ruling in Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 5:29 am
In a highly anticipated decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed last week that investment advisor Hennessee Group LLC could not be liable on the claims asserted by one of its clients for recommending that the client invest in a hedge fund that turned out to be nothing more than a Ponzi scheme perpetrated by Bayou Group LLC. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:42 am
They filed a class action challenging the Vioxx settlement, Weeks v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:42 am
They filed a class action challenging the Vioxx settlement, Weeks v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 8:54 am
United States, the ongoing constitutional challenge to FOSTA/SESTA. 5. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 11:42 am
Reversing a decision by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, an August 21, 2015 decision by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Home Care Association of America v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 11:42 am
Reversing a decision by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, an August 21, 2015 decision by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Home Care Association of America v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 11:02 am
The Supreme Court decided last week in McCutcheon v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:01 pm
Alito wrote a concurring opinion arguing that the statute requires the government to prove only that the defendant knowingly sought to obtain money by means of a falsehood and not for any specific purpose.As I said in my entry last week on the defendant's loss in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:17 am
Yes, say two judges on a Washington Court of Appeals panel, in last week’s State v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 7:57 pm
United States of America. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 9:15 am
On the contrary, it provides that ‘[e]xcept when express provision therefor is made either in a statute of the United States or in these rules,’ the cost-shifting to the prevailing party otherwise applies to all cases. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:39 am
In 2009, a judge in New York dismissed the suit on the grounds that the ACLU's clients — coalition of attorneys and human rights, labor, legal and media organizations whose work requires them to engage in sensitive and sometimes privileged telephone and e-mail communications with individuals located outside the United States — couldn't prove that their communications would be monitored under the new law. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 5:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
As millions of people eagerly await next week’s Supreme Court action in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 11:07 am
United States v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 3:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 2:10 am
Lockwood Reexamination Gripe Goes Nowhere As discussed last week, the case of Lockwood v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Last week was the busiest in the IPKat's history, with a total of 29 blogposts. [read post]
