Search for: "Bounds v. State"
Results 4461 - 4480
of 9,960
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
They are just as ethically bound to represent their clients zealously within the boundaries of the law as we are. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 2:12 pm
As the General Court held in Case T-291/03 Grana Biraghi §55-56: “...OHIM is bound to apply [the CTMR] in such a way as not to affect the protection granted to PDOs .... [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 5:22 am
The agreement provided for the application of Pennsylvania law, and it stated that the parties intended to be “legally bound. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 9:27 am
During war, states are bound by IHL norms that require that they distinguish between civilians and combatants and military objectives (rule of distinction); ensure that the incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, or damage to civilian objects is not excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated (rule of proportionality); and take ‘feasible’ precautions when they carry out attacks to avoid and minimize incidental loss… [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 8:29 am
Patton v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 6:19 am
One justice dissented (Socko v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:04 pm
" And so, "absent agreement or other definitive obligation, this State, as opposed to some others does not hold a child liable for the support of his or her parent. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 12:18 pm
Socko v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 12:00 pm
The state compensates the municipality for the additional costs. 4. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:47 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Socko v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 6:52 am
But they failed to explain how those who opted out would not be bound by the “broad injunctive relief” sought by the remainder of the class. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 11:38 am
No one could deny that Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 2:30 pm
See Hart v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 11:38 am
In today’s case, (Ari v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 9:31 pm
There is nothing in the language of the Sterling National Bank v. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 4:04 pm
This is a very different state of affairs to the prospective liability of search engine operators such as Google Inc under data protection laws, as recognised in Google Spain. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 10:19 am
Postell v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 4:53 am
The Dallas Court of Appeals helped give guidance to an answer in a case styled, Medicus Insurance Company v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:11 am
On 27 October 2015 Mr Justice Blue, sitting at first instance in the Supreme Court of South Australia, handed down judgment on liability in the defamation case of Duffy v Google Inc ([2015] SASC 170). [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 3:07 am
Ever since the Supreme Court’s 1978 decision in Oliphant v. [read post]
