Search for: "Branch v. Mays" Results 4461 - 4480 of 5,631
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2018, 9:00 am by Jesse Tyner Moore
These steps may signal more significant substantive changes in the months ahead. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
The Court accurately perceived the issue as "not. . .simply a question of creating a new liability in the nature of a tort," but rather one of "fiscal policy" and what branch of government properly sets such policy. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:48 am by Elizabeth Goitein
When the government collects foreign intelligence abroad, it generally relies on claims of inherent presidential authority, as regulated by Executive Order (EO) 12333 and related executive branch policies. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:23 pm by Veronika Gaertner
Only in the latter case are the assets located at the branch attributable to the claimant. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:26 pm by Jackie McDermott
” If the president does that, it may fall into a different Youngstown category, Yoo said. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 9:34 pm
  They relied heavily on a 2006 decision by the state's highest court,  Hernandez v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:51 pm by Vikram Raghavan
Moreover, the third branch (the legislature) has taken no action to overturn the judgment. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:57 am by Guest Blogger
  We suspect it may not be the last.Here is a brief sketch of the kind of constitutional argument that our book project, at least, puts front and center. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 12:49 pm
The briefs are each side’s attempt to carry out their view of what the Supreme Court had in mind in its June 12 decision (Boumediene v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
Our Courts have taken the view that not only that they have the authority to challenge decisions of the executive branch but also that of the legislature by invalidating any Act of Parliament if it violates the Constitution even if it is an amending Act[8]. [read post]