Search for: "California v. Force" Results 4461 - 4480 of 6,451
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2017, 8:55 am by jlucivero
With this sweeping new rule, New York has become the first state in the nation to require all of its criminal trial judges to issue so-called “Brady orders” in every case (named after the 1963 case of Brady v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:39 am by Aaron
The Court cautioned that “physical force” means “violent force,” but nonetheless concluded that the assault conviction in this case qualified. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 6:38 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: French National Assembly passes new 3 strikes anti-piracy bill (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (1709 Copyright Blog) (Intellectual Property Watch) CAFC affirms jury verdict that Microsoft’s Outlook software infringed Alcatel-Lucent patent, but finds jury award of $357.6 million damages unreasonable: Lucent Technologies, Inc v… [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:17 pm by Amy Howe
The justices declined to take up the case of Peruta v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 9:49 am by Rob
  This statute has been held invalid (see Lett v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:50 pm by David Lat
Our second story, from northern California, involves graver consequences. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 11:22 pm
"The American public must understand that this situation is no longer about illegal immigration or narcotics trafficking," said David V. [read post]