Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 4461 - 4480
of 34,143
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2021, 8:34 am
Thus, it sets the precedent for both California state courts and federal courts ruling on California law the opinion is published (except for the last two sections, which are inconsequential). [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 11:15 pm
Our own review of California law on strict products liability persuades us that Bolger was correctly decided and that strict liability may attach under the circumstances of this case. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:35 am
In Rowe v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 5:49 pm
On Monday, the California Supreme Court reversed the lower court decision in Hernandez v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Wanetick v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 10:46 am
Weiner * Fair Use – It’s the Law (for what it’s worth)–Lenz v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 11:21 am
While California attempted to defend the law as merely a disclosure regime, the 9th Circuit was unconvinced. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 8:00 am
Fund v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 8:00 am
Fund v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 7:30 am
In Felton v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 5:54 pm
Bounds v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 7:31 pm
Despite this rule of law, in 1988, the California Court of Appeal decided the case of Hanif v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:01 am
CAAF heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 2:23 pm
In a recent pedestrian accident case, Killings-Rodriguez v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 11:09 am
The case, Castro-Ramirez v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 11:09 am
The case, Castro-Ramirez v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 12:25 pm
Otsuka v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 6:00 pm
The Court's opinion in Max Taylor v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 1:15 pm
Justice Hoffstadt begins the opinion by stressing that he's following the English common law on this score, which is the default rule under the California Civil Code. [read post]
