Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 4461 - 4480 of 48,082
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2013, 1:44 pm by WIMS
Next, they argue that EPA impermissibly considered cost in revising emissions standards under section 112(d)(6). [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:51 am by skelly
(v) The availability of the value-added product or service must be based on documented objective evidence and offered in a manner that is not unfairly discriminatory. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 8:50 am by Lawrence Solum
Pomeroy (Pacific Legal Foundation - Program for Judicial Awareness and Pacific Legal Foundation) have posted Desperately Seeking Scrutiny: Why the Supreme Court Should Use Fisher v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:19 pm
”Whatever errors the district court may have made in evaluating the inputs for Professor Shapiro’s quantitative model, the model did not take into account long-term contracts, which would constrain Turner Broadcasting’s ability to raise content prices for distributors. . . .[7]            The appellate court notes that the district court did not conduct a costs benefit analysis balancing “increased prices for… [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:19 pm
”Whatever errors the district court may have made in evaluating the inputs for Professor Shapiro’s quantitative model, the model did not take into account long-term contracts, which would constrain Turner Broadcasting’s ability to raise content prices for distributors. . . .[7]            The appellate court notes that the district court did not conduct a costs benefit analysis balancing “increased prices for… [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d 217, the Court of Appeals, quoting Matter of Fink v Lefkowitz, 47 NY2d 567, said that "To promote open government and public accountability, FOIL* imposes a broad duty on government agencies to make their records available to the public. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 11:38 am by Jared Klaus
It comes as no surprise that the United States Supreme Court’s decision in American Express Co. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 7:48 am
As the Supreme Court has noted, the polluter pays principle “has become firmly entrenched in environmental law in Canada”: Imperial Oil Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Matter of Abdur-Rashid v New York City Police Dept., 31 NY3d 217, the Court of Appeals, quoting Matter of Fink v Lefkowitz, 47 NY2d 567, said that "To promote open government and public accountability, FOIL* imposes a broad duty on government agencies to make their records available to the public. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 11:03 am
All 'reasonable costs' incurred by a medical provider in locating, copying, or making the records available may be charged to the requesting party, subject to limits set forth in the statute, which include $0.10 per page for reproducing documents measuring up to 8.5 by 14 inches, $0.20 per page for producing documents from microfilm, and clerical costs not to exceed $16 per hour per person for locating and making records available. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:11 am by N. Peter Rasmussen
Morgan Stanley also had no implied duty under applicable New York law to charge a fee that was reasonably proportionate to actual costs where it notified customers in advance of the charges and customers were free to decide whether to continue to do business with Morgan Stanley.Appert v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:28 am by CJ.Harding
Take for example the case of Reagins v. [read post]