Search for: "Degree v. United States"
Results 4461 - 4480
of 6,520
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2014, 3:22 am
The plaintiffs contended that because they had completed the swap contracts transactions in the United States, the swap transactions represented “domestic transactions” within the meaning of the “second prong” of the Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
” Perhaps unsurprisingly, Barnes was found guilty of, among other things, two counts of first-degree murder. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
United States In South Carolina the case of Charleston City Paper has confirmed libel law principles, Blog Law Online comments. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 1:20 pm
District Judge Adalberto Jordan's decision of September 29 in Langbehn v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
The uniting thread among the various factions within the Progressive Movement was the view that government in the United States had become systematically corrupt. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:00 am
So the United States Supreme Court says, Yes, there was IAC here. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:41 pm
Nor do we find on these facts a violation of the establishment clause of the United States Constitution…. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 8:19 am
Supreme Court in June 1992 established the “Daubert Rule” in its landmark decision Daubert v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 9:41 am
Statutes in that form pervade the United States Code. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:03 am
United States). [read post]
10 May 2017, 3:45 am
So in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
He received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Michigan State University in 1968 and his Masters degree from Michigan State University in 1971. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:02 pm
After long proceedings at national level, a preliminary ruling by the CJEU on 16 December 2008 (Case C-73/07), and after the Court of Human Rights Chamber judgment of 21 July 2015, the Grand Chamber on 27 June 2017 finally found no violation of the right to freedom of expression and information in Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
”And finally, did:the combined effect of [R (Limbuela) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 1 AC 396 (HL(E)) ] and Clue establish that there is a free standing duty to accommodate and provide cash to a person like the Claimant who is within the boundaries of a local authority and whose Convention rights are threatened? [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
”And finally, did:the combined effect of [R (Limbuela) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 1 AC 396 (HL(E)) ] and Clue establish that there is a free standing duty to accommodate and provide cash to a person like the Claimant who is within the boundaries of a local authority and whose Convention rights are threatened? [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
It states simply that “[n]either slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 7:30 am
President Clinton on numerous occasions averred that the United States was not at war. [read post]
19 May 2014, 5:00 am
The United States District Court held that the ordinance was a fee for the purposes of the TIA. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:56 am
Mincing no words in her dissent, in which Justice Kagan joined, Justice Sotomayor wrote: “The United States of America is a Nation built upon the promise of religious liberty. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 6:23 pm
The Supreme Court, in Meacham v. [read post]
