Search for: "Degree v. United States" Results 4461 - 4480 of 6,520
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2012, 7:30 am
New Jersey has adopted the rule expressed by the United State Supreme Court in Brady v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:07 am by Brandon W. Barnett
In 2002, the United States Supreme Court determined that the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 7:23 am
Cocaine Possession In 1970, the federal government passed the Controlled Substances Act in order to regulate possession of illicit drugs in the United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:53 am by Alain Leibman
For example, on March 12, 2012, the Ninth Circuit handed down its opinion in United States v Ressam, 2012 WL 762986 (9th Cir. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 4:18 am by Benjamin Wittes
 citizens and other persons within the United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:49 pm by Eugene Volokh
Although previously we upheld the constitutionality of the Act, as applied to convicted felons, in State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:14 pm by William A. Ruskin
An earlier Ninth Circuit decision in the case discussed how Teck’s smelter had dumped slag waste into the Columbia River, ten miles north of the border, over several decades of operation, which resulted in pollution downstream in the United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:52 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: The United States has a strong tradition of state regulation that stretches back to the Commonwealth ideal of Revolutionary times and grew steadily throughout the nineteenth century. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:00 am by stevehansen
 This could be explained by stating that “the prior art provided orthogonal load bearing structures to provide sufficient support for previous modular units. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:11 am by Joe Palazzolo
United States (11-247), in which the court will decide whether the state's controversial immigration law usurps the federal government's authority to regulate immigration laws and enforcement. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 10:50 am
United States, 531 U.S. 12 (2000), the defendants made a motion to dismiss the Scheme to Defraud charges on the grounds that the broker-dealer licenses could not be considered "property. [read post]