Search for: "Does 1 - 23"
Results 4461 - 4480
of 15,476
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2020, 9:05 am
However, this first lawsuit does not contain an express CCPA claim but rather argues that CCPA violations form a predicate violation for a UCL § 17200 cause of action. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 9:05 am
However, this first lawsuit does not contain an express CCPA claim but rather argues that CCPA violations form a predicate violation for a UCL § 17200 cause of action. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 11:44 am
Multistate E. coli O26 Outbreak, Jimmy John’s Restaurants Alfalfa Sprouts 2012 29 Sickened – A total of 29 individuals infected with the outbreak strain of E. coli O26 were reported from 11 states, including: Alabama (1), Arkansas (1), Iowa (5), Kansas (2), Michigan (10), Missouri (3), Ohio (3), Pennsylvania (1), Washington (1), Wisconsin (1), and West Virginia (1). [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 7:36 am
Susan does! [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:30 pm
This court also strengthened the arguments against the opening of the proceedings by adding that ‘it would constitute a “waste of time and resources”, or even an unlawful restriction of the rights of others [that is to say Internet commenters’]’ (§23). [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:02 pm
Delta Enterprise Corp. filed a notice of opposition on 23 April 2016 on the basis of its own trade mark in respect of goods in Classes 9, 18, 20, 25 and 28.Delta Enterprise Corp.'searlier trade markThe Opposition Division of the EUIPO rejected Delta Sport's application in respect of some of the goods in classes 20 and 28 on 6 July 2017, which Delta Sport sought to appeal. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 8:32 am
The case was argued April 23, 2019. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 8:37 pm
The trial judge stated, [44] Given his age and his lack of a criminal record, it is clear that the accused does not represent a danger for the community. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
She is the author of Talking to Strangers[1] written in 2004 which focuses on interracial distrust in the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
”It therefore appears, at least in Lebanon County where the Loose case was handed down, that having different companies providing UIM coverage under a given set of facts does not change the result that the Household Exclusion is invalid as a being violative exclusion is not valid. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:43 pm
UNI represents the interests of affiliated unions and their members vis-à-vis multinational companies, Table of Contents Introduction 1 The NCP procedure 1 Summary of the notification 2 Summary of the initial response of VEON 3 The NCP’s assessment of the specific instance 4 The NCP’s observations 5 The NCP’s recommendations and conclusions 7 Monitoring 8 List of abbreviations 8 | 1| governments, and national and international bodies that take… [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 9:54 am
District Court for the Southern District of California found that claims 2 and 23 of U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 3:33 pm
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, January 23, 2020, BleachTech LLC, v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 3:00 pm
A felony is classified as a crime that can carry more than 1 year in jail. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 2:00 pm
Hire a local Clinton Township lawyer because court personnel cannot give legal advice and the prosecutor does not represent you! [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 6:37 pm
In addition, the stats show that less than 1% say they have used their bank’s Midata service, while 14% are likely to use it in the next three months and less than 1% say they have had any correspondence from their bank about it. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
None of these provisions has been subject to detailed Court of Justice exploration and all must be interpreted in line with freedom of expression and, in particular, permissible exemptions applicable to the special data category rules (GDPR, art. 9(1)(g)), the criminal-related data rules (GDPR, art. 10) and the more general restrictions permissible where necessary to protect the “rights and freedoms of others” (GDPR, art. 23(1)(i)). [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 8:24 am
First, the court found that a Rule 23(b)(2) class seeking injunctive relief was inappropriate for two reasons: (1) the claim for monetary relief was not incidental to the claim for injunctive or declaratory relief; and (2) the defendant had brought its procedures into compliance with the new decision, and thus “[a]ny request for injunctive relief is therefore moot” because “Plaintiff has failed to show any likelihood of the harm reoccurring. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 5:00 am
(Clinton’s trial memorandum, by contrast, does not cite OLC opinions at all.) [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 1:52 am
"1.3 In comparison to above claim, claim 1 of the main request has been amended as follows:"1. [read post]
