Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 4461 - 4480
of 13,847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2006, 9:06 am
Hearing at Valdosta on Oct. 29, 2003. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:45 am
The variety of fraudulent schemes and scams is limited only by human imagination and greed, which is to say it is boundless.The FCA does not seek to impose punishment or provide remedies for innocent billing errors. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:30 am
The petitions of the week are: Doe v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 10:39 am
ComplexDiscovery anonymizes responses to this survey and does not share any individual or organizational contact data, demographics or answers. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 6:11 am
Sec. 1.72(p)-1). [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Blake, [2000] UKHL 45, [2001] 1 A.C. 268 (H.L.) [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 2:53 pm
We should simply eliminate successive state habeas petitions and federal habeas review for any claim that does not go to actual innocence. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:51 pm
The referring court has accordingly stayed the proceedings and referred the following questions to the Court for a preliminary ruling: (1) Does the concept of ‘fair compensation’ in Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29 entail harmonisation, irrespective of the Member States’ right to choose the system of collection which they deem appropriate for the purposes of giving effect to the right to fair compensation of intellectual… [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:43 am
This does not mean there cannot be other restrictions on voting, but the government must justify them under section 1: see, for example, Fitzgerald v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Second, it has a flat 20 percent tax on individual income that does not apply to personal dividend income. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 8:29 am
” Currently, health care facilities in the City, like the vast majority of employers, are covered by the City’s general minimum wage of $16.04 as of July 1, 2022. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm
We recommend section 1 be amended both to state the survival of common law innocent dissemination – as recently clarified in Metropolitan Schools v DesignTechnica [2009] EWHC 1765 (QB) – and to bring the scope of section 1 into line with the Ecommerce Directive -or better still, to delete the current section and cross-refer to the protection of the Directive. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 4:40 pm
Below are some questions that will help you to think about specific issues important to you and your family. 1) Do you have a current Living Will (Advance Directive)? [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Those states were Alaska[1], Arizona[2], Idaho[3], Michigan[4], New York[5], North Dakota[6], and Utah[7]. [read post]
8 May 2017, 7:55 am
” 29 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 4:31 am
But apparently this decision has come as a surprise in some quarters.The s.215(1) argument remains to be heard. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 4:31 am
But apparently this decision has come as a surprise in some quarters.The s.215(1) argument remains to be heard. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
See Doe v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
§ 553.30(b)(1). [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 5:19 pm
Superior Court (2002) 29 Cal.4th 262 (Pavlovich.) [read post]
