Search for: "German v. German" Results 4461 - 4480 of 5,202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2014, 3:55 am by Kevin LaCroix
Deutscher Tennis Bund (German Tennis Federation). [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV,… [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:10 am by INFORRM
Lord Ashcroft v Foley [2011] EWHC 292 (QB). [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Securities Class Actions In June 2010, the US Supreme Court released its landmark decision in Morrison v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 7:30 am by Ted Parson
2022 Flooding in PakistanAs I noted in my last post, this year’s conference of the parties to the climate treaties (COP27) became pretty much a single-issue conference, focused on adaptation and the associated needs for finance – in particular on the urgent need for financial assistance to support adaptation in the Global South, and the lamentable record of unfulfilled promises for climate finance. [read post]
The case went up to the German Supreme Federal Court, which confirmed that EP504 was valid and infringed on 24 November 2020. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am by Thorsten Bausch
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 6:18 am by Jennifer Trahan
  Subsequently, in the Decision on Immunity from Jurisdiction, Prosecutor v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 9:08 pm by Darren O'Donovan
Ironically, some of these supports come from the German Constitutional Court. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:31 pm by Benjamin Bissell
According to the BBC, a report from the Global Terrorism Index found that the number of deaths from terrorism increased by 61 percent in 2013, while the number of attacks increased by 44 percent. [read post]