Search for: "IN RE JONES" Results 4461 - 4480 of 4,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2011, 4:00 am by Kim Zetter
Cruder than other forms of surveillance — they report only where a suspect’s car goes, not who is in the car or what occupants do when they arrive at a location — they’re nonetheless frequently used for supplementary surveillance. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 7:16 pm
This is all the most telling email tells us: Phil Jones wrote: > >> Mike, > Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4? [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm by John Elwood
  For the next couple of weeks, until the case actually is decided and my incredible clairvoyance receives the recognition it so richly deserves, we’re left with the usual diet of relists and holds to dissect. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:49 am by Shea Denning
See In re Latasha W., 70 Cal.Rptr.2d 886 (Cal. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:47 am by Rory Little
The CJLF amicus brief mentioned by Breyer suggests that a ruling for Jennings on the procedural point will actually speed the implementation of state capital judgments, a concern that may be particularly relevant (if unspoken) in light of cases like Jones v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 4:43 pm
Barnes, but his view that Brennan's rhetoric invites re-thinking of an issue in foundational terms is congenial to my argument above. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 10:15 pm by GWS Law
C’s costs do not form part of the “pot” of money against which D may enforce its costs. (4) D’s points re policy and legislative intention are in effect that same as those rejected in Ho. (5) There is prima facie binding authority confirming that DAs are not standalone proceedings. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:00 am by David Bernstein
The Court also upheld the federal Jones Act and the federal Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act. [read post]
15 May 2011, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
  We also re-posted a discussion of the case from the always thoughtful Law Think blog. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 6:17 pm by Inside Privacy
, Washington Post (Aug. 3, 2017) https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/08/03/the-kronos-indictment-it-a-crime-to-create-and-sell-malware [2] In re Hijazi, 589 F.3d 401, 412 (7th Cir. 2009). [3] United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:48 am by John Elwood
While you’re noodling that, let’s talk relists. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 11:41 am
Nager of Jones Day argued on behalf of respondent. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 10:17 am by Josh Blackman
This orthodoxy was so entrenched that the University of Virginia SCOTUS clinic was criticized for successfully petitioning for certiorari in Jones v. [read post]