Search for: "In Re H. S." Results 4461 - 4480 of 9,913
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2014, 9:10 am by Martin Steiger
[…] Da der Vergabestelle und dem Bund bereits vor der Einleitung des Vergabeverfahrens bekannt gewesen sei, dass ausländische Geheimdienste im Zusammenhang mit der Datenbeschaffung aktiv seien, hätten die Eignungskriterien bereits in der Ausschreibung im Hinblick auf Datenschutz- und Datensicherheit entsprechend formuliert hätten werden können. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 3:37 am by SHG
Whether it’s the latitude they’re given to shoot, or demand submission to their will, there is a price to pay. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 3:03 pm
” Brown maintains that Dukakis’s lead over George H. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 12:33 pm by Cindy Cohn
Compare them, for example, with this comment from former FBI Director Louis Freeh in May of 1995, now nearly twenty years ago: [W]e're in favor of strong encryption, robust encryption. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 8:22 am by Thomas Ince
This post was written by Thomas Ince and Laura H. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 7:41 pm by Howard Knopf
(Wherein Rick Mercer Goes Remarkably Rogue re Reliability and his Research Resourcefulness: Warning - this Rant is Hazardous to the State of Canadian Journalism and Rick's Otherwise Respected Role Therein) Countless “C” words have been in circulation re Copyright, Campaigns, a Certain Consortium, Collusion, Conspiracy, Co-conspirators,  Cartel, Censorship, Confidence, CTV, CBC, Conservatives, and Commissioner of Competition. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 3:05 pm by Keith L. Miller
The SJC reviewed the case and found that the attorney’s conduct constituted violation of Mass.R.Prof.C. 8.4 (c), (d), and (h). [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 10:54 am
Understanding emerging Multipolarity through a Gramscian Lens Rémi Bachand, Le droit international et l'idéologie droits-de-l'hommiste au fondement de l'hégémonie occidentale Fabrice Argounès, Hégémonie(s) émergente(s)? [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
(quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts §911, comment h (1977)). [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:03 am
 You don't need to read it right now, because the new Guidelines don't come into force until 1 November -- but we don't like our readers to be caught unawares so we're telling you now. [read post]