Search for: "In Re Steven"
Results 4461 - 4480
of 6,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2010, 3:46 pm
In so doing, he shreds the “parchment barriers” established by our Founders; he forgets, as Steven Pinker has noted: Someone must be empowered to make decisions and enforce laws, and that someone is inherently vulnerable to corruption. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:27 pm
Miller (even if, as Heller concluded, the "hundreds of judges" Justice Stevens cites as reading Miller broadly were in fact overreading the case)? [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 1:59 pm
(Disclosure: We're co-counsel for respondents, along with Public Justice and the Hardy Law Firm of Reno, Nevada.) [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Clinton re-nominated Garland in January 1997, and he was confirmed approximately three months later by a vote of 76-23. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
Assisted living facilities are rapidly becoming the nursing homes of the future. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:15 am
(We’re grateful to Erin Carter at Dechert for reviewing Judge Wood’s Greatest Hits) [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
Stevens, which struck down on First Amendment grounds the federal statute banning creation or sale of depictions of animal cruelty. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
I. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:33 am
We're team players. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 1:04 am
Costco argued that Omega was unable to impose limits on the manner in which its watches are re-sold after Omega makes its first sale of the watches. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 6:41 am
Justice Breyer filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Stevens, and Ginsburg; Justice Sonia Sotomayor did not participate in the decision. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 9:45 am
Stevens refuses to apply the same exemptions to the First Amendment that were extended to depictions of child pornography in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:42 am
By In re Yamashita (upholding the military commission trial of a Japanese general), issued the year before Justice Stevens took up work at the Court, Rutledge was writing in dissent, rejecting the Government’s position “that there is no law restrictive upon these proceedings other than whatever rules and regulations may be prescribed for their government by the executive authority or the military,” in favor of the view that the U.S. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:19 am
Stevens, a case about videos of animal cruelty. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:32 pm
Justice Stevens is, after all, also the author of Chevron v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 11:45 am
Isn’t the league entitled to know whether they’re pitchers or catchers? [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 11:43 am
Stevens, the HSUS has called on Congress to fix the law. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:32 am
- Steven M. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:05 am
Even when we're just starting it. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 8:01 am
But does the Stevens decision lead us to stop eating meat? [read post]
