Search for: "Kennedy Thomas"
Results 4461 - 4480
of 4,886
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2008, 11:14 am
Tom F, following the recusal of Justice Kennedy.) [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 12:36 pm
Generally speaking, Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas and Alito are thought to be pro-employer when it comes to employment cases. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:52 pm
Justice Kennedy, writing for the Court, reasoned that the Intake Questionnaire, coupled with an attached affidavit, contained all the information required of a Charge by regulation. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 10:42 pm
Thomas E. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 4:00 pm
is granted, I would hope that the Virginia statute would be overturned at least by Justices Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 10:48 am
He often sides with Scalia and Kennedy. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 9:50 pm
If you think that the answer might be (A), then you are probably Justice Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, or Breyer.I ask you, how can you disagree with that? [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 4:43 pm
Similarly, Justices Stevens, Breyer, and Souter have joined with Justices Kennedy, O'Connor, Rehnquist, Alito and Roberts to find due process limitations on punitive damage awards. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 2:29 pm
Although the Court's most liberal Justices--Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer--were all in the majority, the case split the conservatives: Justices Scalia, Thomas and Alito joined the majority, while Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kennedy dissented. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 9:17 am
”Justice Kennedy wrote the 7-2 Holowecki opinion. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 5:29 am
Justice Thomas agrees: “Given the Court’s utterly vague criteria, whatever the agency later decides to regard as a charge is a charge â€â [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 1:51 pm
Justice Thomas was silent as usual, but is probably in Scalia's camp on that issue. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 10:00 am
In a 5-3 opinion (Justice Breyer recused himself) authored by Justice Kennedy,the Court, in Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 7:13 am
Today’s opinion by Justice Kennedy in Federal Express v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 7:05 am
Kennedy wrote for the majority; Justice Clarence Thomas dissented, joined by Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 3:17 am
Justice Thomas dissented and was joined by Justice Scalia. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 8:41 pm
Sturley called the arguments “well argued on both sides,” and said that all the Justices (save Thomas) asked at least one question. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:27 pm
Less often, he talks to Justice Anthony Kennedy, to his immediate left. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 7:58 am
However, in this essay, I assume what has been the case so far from Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito - that they are reliable votes joining Justices Scalia and Thomas on the Court’s more conservative wing. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 2:41 am
Meanwhile, Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas took a broader view than the two other decisions by holding that the Plaintiff, Mr. [read post]
