Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B" Results 4461 - 4480 of 5,814
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2011, 12:02 am
b) Can the manufacture and sale in the UK of a complete kit of parts to assemble a device which falls within a patent claim infringe? [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
If so, did it matter that the Defence post-dated the Claim Form? [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
… In the light of our decision in the present appeal the lawyers preparing for those appeals will have the opportunity to give particular attention to these aspects of the matter. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
… In the light of our decision in the present appeal the lawyers preparing for those appeals will have the opportunity to give particular attention to these aspects of the matter. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
”[6] (b) Mr Hugh Tomlinson QC: the need for appropriate remedies as well as protection of bloggers If agreement of the kind described by Mr Justice Eady could be reached concerning the applicable law, why not also agreement about applicable remedies? [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In addition, the Court noted the significant differences between the constitutional and political contexts of the two countries, societal differences, the different position of the media and the degree to which the courts had left matters for judicial interpretation (at 399). [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
Highlights this week included: Australian Advisory Council on Intellectual Property releases Final Report on Patentable Subject Matter (Patentology) (ipwars.com) (IP Whiteboard) (IPKat) European Parliament gives go-ahead for enhanced cooperation (EPLAW) (IPKat) (IPKat) (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you… [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:16 pm by Stephen Page
I was referred to the decision of Cronin J in Charles & Charles [2007] FamCA 276. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 12:48 pm by Stephen Page
The Family Court recently ordered that the mother have sole parental responsibility for a child, J, aged 4, and that the father shall not spend time with the child or communicate with the child. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 7:14 am by The Legal Blog
.-(1) Save as otherwise expressly provided in this Act,-(a) any text, rule or interpretation of Hindu law or any custom or usage as part of that law in force immediately before the commencement of this Act shall cease to have effect with respect to any matter for which provision is made in this Act;(b) any other law in force immediately before the commencement of this Act shall cease to apply to Hindus in so far as it is inconsistent with any of the provisions contained in this… [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm by Stephen Page
That approach was adopted by Strickland J in Parker v Parker [2010] FamCA 664 (3 August 2010). [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 7:53 pm by Stephen Page
The mother asserts that J, aged not yet 6 at the time, “puts on an act” out of fear of his father. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:33 am by war
However, that does not take the matter far. [read post]